Vishwajit Dahanukar

4 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Appellants to file representation with evidence that they were not promoters

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-72540B4EDA00A8DA1DB76026
Misc. Application No. 198 of 2019 rejected
Appeal: Misc. Application No. 198 of 2019 in Appeal No. 434 of 2018 - application rejected by SAT order dated 12.04.2019
SAT matter SATV-87C165A70DF8833CB8964D62
Six weeks further time allowed to BSE Limited to decide representation filed by Original Appellants · Misc. Application No. 92 of 2019 disposed of accordingly
Appeal: Misc. Application No. 92 of 2019 in Appeal No. 434 of 2018 disposed on 01.03.2019; prior SAT order dated 07.01.2019 directed decision on representation
Dispute over promoter classification; appellants allege they were treated as promoters without being heard
Delay in filing appeal condoned · Appellants to file representation with evidence that they were not promoters
Appeal: Appeal No. 434 of 2018 and Misc. Application No. 387 of 2018 disposed on 07.01.2019; delay condoned
SAT matter SATV-FBD54A7DB75FF8A75E60E8FC
Six weeks further time granted to BSE Limited to decide representation filed by appellants · Misc. Application No. 200 of 2019 disposed of accordingly
Appeal: Misc. Application No. 200 of 2019 in Appeal No. 434 of 2018 disposed on 16.04.2019 with extension granted

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Vishwajit Dahanukar. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.