Vinod Kumar Bansal
Penalties and directions recorded
- Penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs payable jointly and severally by the noticees upheld.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-0A0E82C3FCE111DB25FDF4BEAppeal adjourned by consent to 03 September 2025 · Appellant was granted time and declined to file a rejoinderAppeal: Appeal No. 047 of 2025; order dated 19 August 2025; adjourned to 03 September 2025
- SAT matter SATV-1A9FCA5A70199DFF079A484DTime granted to the appellant to complete instructions · Appeal directed to be listed for admission on 7 March 2025Appeal: Appeal No. 047 of 2025, along with Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 54, 55 and 157 of 2025; order dated 3 February 2025; admission deferred to 7 March 2025
- Violations relating to non-submission of information, misuse of clients’ funds and securities, transfer of funds to an associated company, non-redressal of investor complaints, failure to conduct running-account settlement, and non-disclosure of DP account details to the stock exchange.Miscellaneous Application No. 507 of 2023 allowed; order dated 28 March 2023 recalled and Appeal No. 241 of 2023 restored. · Appeal No. 241 of 2023 dismissed.Appeal: Appeal No. 241 of 2023 dismissed by SAT on 9 June 2023; Misc. Application No. 507 of 2023 allowed and the appeal restored.
- SAT matter SATV-241E9F913D7E09221FC58521Appeal No. 241 of 2023 dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Appeal No. 241 of 2023 dismissed for want of prosecution on 28 March 2023; Miscellaneous Application No. 180 of 2023 also listed.
- Ficus engaged in misappropriation of client securities and funds, non-settlement of client accounts, false margin reporting, non-disclosure of DP accounts and deficient client credit balances.Appeal dismissed without any order as to costs, confirmatory order upheld · Continued restraint from accessing and dealing in securities market and cease and desistAppeal: Misc. Application No. 443 of 2019 allowed condoning delay; Appeal No. 362 of 2019 dismissed on 09.06.2021
- SAT matter SATV-AEE9ABCFDB68012B03251022Adjourned on request of appellant's counsel · List for admission on March 28, 2023Appeal: Appeal No. 241 of 2023 with Misc. Application No. 180 of 2023 pending; adjourned on 15.03.2023 and listed for admission on March 28, 2023
- Alleged failure by broking companies promoted by appellant to refund approximately Rs 35 crore to clientsApplication for condonation of 860 days delay dismissed · Appeal No. 47 of 2025 consequently dismissed, WTM restraint and refund directions sustainedAppeal: Appeal No. 47 of 2025 dismissed on 3 September 2025 for 860 days delay; prior appeal against AO order dated 31 October 2022 filed 14 January 2023 dismissed 9 June 2023
- SAT matter SATV-CF0BC8E6837087E41333662FSEBI granted one week's time to file reply · Appellant granted six weeks thereafter to file rejoinderAppeal: Appeal No. 47 of 2025 pending; adjourned vide order dated 17.06.2025 to August 19, 2025 for completion of pleadings
- SAT matter SATV-E4D61A6236663C55D8027BA5SEBI permitted to file reply on condonation of delay and merits within six weeks · Appellant may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter, if anyAppeal: Appeal No. 047 of 2025 pending; reply stage; next date 17.06.2025
- SAT matter SATV-F3A617D80B72DA15D226A838Correction ordered to amend appellant advocate appearance in order dated September 3, 2025Appeal: Appeal No. 47 of 2025 with Misc. Application Nos. 54, 55, 157 and 731 of 2025 - correction order passed on 15.09.2025
Source: SecMarx — Vinod Kumar Bansal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.