Venkatraman Natarajan

3 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Appeals challenge the AO’s ex parte order dated December 28, 2018 imposing ₹50 lakh penalty jointly and severally.

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-0D5C6F4733784BD098E5D06A
Adjournment granted by consent · Appeal listed for admission on 9 March 2026
Appeal: Appeal No. 372 of 2025, with Misc. Applications Nos. 871 and 872 of 2025; on 27 January 2026, adjourned and listed for admission on 9 March 2026
Alleged non-compliance with SEBI’s directions prohibiting Citrus Check Inns Limited and its directors from collecting money under schemes or launching new schemes while conducting CIS activities.
Appeals challenge the AO’s ex parte order dated December 28, 2018 imposing ₹50 lakh penalty jointly and severally. · Tribunal considered appellants’ natural-justice challenge based on alleged non-service of SCN, hearing notices and impugned order.
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 371, 372 and 374 of 2025 under Section 15T; order pronounced June 15, 2026; final disposal outcome is not included in the supplied extract.
SAT matter SATV-CA1CB0EB36B08778934993E8
Order reserved after hearing advocates for parties
Appeal: Appeal No. 372 of 2025 with Misc. Application Nos. 871 and 872 of 2025 heard on 09.04.2026, order reserved

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Venkatraman Natarajan. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.