Uves Younus Sareshwala
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appeal No. 62 of 2019 dismissed as not maintainable as AO penalty order was against directors, not company
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-174D34B48934B43276F9AFF9Miscellaneous Application No. 631 of 2021 seeking condonation of delay was rejected. · Appeal No. 437 of 2021 was dismissed for inordinate delay, with no order as to costs.Appeal: Appeal No. 437 of 2021 disposed of on 14 July 2022 by dismissal for inordinate delay; Miscellaneous Application No. 631 of 2021 for condonation of delay rejected. Miscellaneous Application No. 630 of 2021 disposed of accordingly.
- Non-compliance with SEBI WTM direction dated July 27, 2010 to make an open offer, affirmed by Supreme Court of India.Appeal No. 62 of 2019 dismissed as not maintainable as AO penalty order was against directors, not companyAppeal: Appeal No. 62 of 2019 with Misc. Application No. 67 of 2019 dismissed as not maintainable on 28.01.2020
- SAT matter SATV-9AF0A70EDF220E4458FA4161Delay condonation rejected for want of sufficient cause · Appeal No.438 of 2021 dismissed on ground of inordinate delay of 591 daysAppeal: Appeal No.438 of 2021 with Misc. Applications 632-633 of 2021 dismissed on 14.07.2022 for 591 days delay
- Issue of 80,800 false share certificates with forged transfers and non-compliance for over 10 years with WTM-directed public open offer.Appeal No.818 of 2021 dismissed with no order as to costs, WTM interim order upheld · Appellants to take steps and complete public open offer per order dated 27 July 2010
Source: SecMarx — Uves Younus Sareshwala. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.