Utsav Pathak

2 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

AO had held appellant guilty of insider trading but imposed no penalty (SAT final merits beyond excerpt)

SAT-appeal

Appellant privy to impending CRISIL open offer including probable pricing allegedly tipped sister and 3 family members; Tippee-1 and 2 traded for profit in violation of Regulation 3(ii).
Misc. Application No.138 of 2020 disposed of after preponing hearing via video conference · AO had held appellant guilty of insider trading but imposed no penalty (SAT final merits beyond excerpt)
Appeal: Appeal No.430 of 2019 against AO order 30.08.2019; reserved 05.06.2020, decision 12.06.2020; Misc App 138/2020 disposed of
SAT matter SATV-B3424F02F351F71BF6E72492
Order reserved after hearing parties · Written submissions may be filed within three days from 05.06.2020
Appeal: Appeal No.430 of 2019 with Misc. Application No.138 of 2020 (urgency application); heard on 05.06.2020, order reserved

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Utsav Pathak. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.