Umesh Patel and Sonal Patel
Penalties and directions recorded
- AO penalty order quashed for violation of natural justice
- Matters remitted to AO for fresh decision on merits after hearing
- Impugned AO penalty order quashed for violation of principles of natural justice
- Matters remitted to AO for fresh decision on merits after giving hearing
- Impugned AO penalty order quashed for violation of natural justice
SAT-appeal
- Alleged violation of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 per common SCN dated 27.07.2012; specifics not detailed in SAT order.AO penalty order quashed for violation of natural justice · All Appeals No. 542-550 of 2020 allowed with costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549 and 550 of 2020 allowed on 02.03.2022; impugned AO order quashed and remanded for fresh hearing
- Alleged violation of SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003 leading to AO penalty proceedings; specific manipulative trades not detailed in this remand order.Impugned AO penalty order quashed for violation of principles of natural justice · All Appeals Nos. 542 to 550 of 2020 allowed with costsAppeal: SAT Appeals Nos. 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549 and 550 of 2020 allowed and disposed on 02.03.2022 (reserved 23.02.2022); earlier appeal against AO order dated 05.06.2013 allowed on 18.12.2013 and remitted
- Alleged violation of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 per common SCN dated 27 July 2012 and supplementary SCN dated 31 Oct 2014.Impugned AO penalty order quashed for violation of natural justice · All Appeals Nos. 542-550 of 2020 allowed with costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549 and 550 of 2020 allowed by SAT order dated 02.03.2022 (reserved 23.02.2022)
Source: SecMarx — Umesh Patel and Sonal Patel. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.