Umang Kejriwal
Penalties and directions recorded
- Penalties imposed by the adjudicating officer upheld
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-033003F7DE12FE8EF7D978ADOrder follows the same order as Appeal No. 25 of 2010, decided on 1 April 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 27 of 2010 decided on 1 April 2010; order states it is the same as the order in Appeal No. 25 of 2010 decided the same day.
- The company allegedly failed to frame a code of internal procedures and conduct aligned with the model code. The directors allegedly failed to make required disclosures under Regulation 13(4).Appeals Nos. 25 to 27 of 2010 dismissed · Penalties imposed by the adjudicating officer upheldAppeal: Appeal No. 25 of 2010, along with Appeals Nos. 26 and 27 of 2010, dismissed on 01 April 2010.
Source: SecMarx — Umang Kejriwal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.