Swati Sandesh Mayekar
Penalties and directions recorded
- SEBI to consider an application filed within two weeks and preferably pass orders within six weeks thereafter
- Appellants to pursue application before NSE with further evidence if any
SAT-appeal
- Appellants alleged that SMC Global Securities, Sunchan Securities and Sunil Mansinghani connived to fraudulently use appellants’ funds and securities for their own gains.Miscellaneous Application and Appeal No. 182 of 2016 withdrawn and disposed of · Appellants permitted to approach SEBI for redressal of remaining grievancesAppeal: Appeal No. 182 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 127 of 2016 disposed of on 16 June 2016 on withdrawal; Respondent No. 2’s Appeal No. 152 of 2013 was dismissed on 31 January 2014.
- SAT matter SATV-03ADFB92E5555DAE5FE9C089Miscellaneous application for condonation of 1350-day delay rejected · Appeal dismissed on the ground of inordinate delayAppeal: Appeal No. 118 of 2020 dismissed on 24 September 2021 after rejection of Misc. Application No. 601 of 2020 for condonation of delay.
- SAT matter SATV-DF1AD3681582BFAB11926C33Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 for recall rejected summarily as patently misconceived · Tribunal order dated October 24, 2016 not recalledAppeal: Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 in Appeal No. 310 of 2016 decided on 24.09.2021 - recall rejected
- Clearing member SMC Global allegedly misused securities of Sunchan's clients including appellants in collusion with trading member Sunchan and made wrongful gains; disgorgement/restitution sought.Appeal No. 165 of 2020 dismissed as lacking merit and misuse of process · No order as to costs
- SAT matter SATV-AAB7F46CF7F8F49161899F65Appeal No. 310 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 allowed to be withdrawn · All contentions of both sides kept openAppeal: Appeal No. 310 of 2016 with Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 disposed as withdrawn on 24.10.2016
- SAT matter SATV-CC6A1E1341CAC60C56EB4CF356 days delay in filing appeal condoned and Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 disposed · Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed on 28.06.2016 as infructuous; Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 for condonation of 56 days delay allowed
Source: SecMarx — Swati Sandesh Mayekar. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.