Suresh Bharrat

4 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Impugned penalty order to stand satisfied subject to payment in two installments
Non-compliance permits SEBI to enforce the impugned order and pursue criminal proceedings
Praecipe allowed by consent to correct typographical errors in the order dated 16 June 2015.
Attachment levied pursuant to Recovery Certificate No. 563 of 2015 to continue for five weeks

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-09C143BAC67D55B90809F2F8
Delay of 1514 days in filing the appeal condoned · Impugned penalty order to stand satisfied subject to payment in two installments
Appeal: Appeal No. 175 of 2013 and Misc. Application No. 109 of 2013 disposed of on 18 December 2013; delay condoned and payment undertaking accepted
SAT matter SATV-387109651EACBD17F7BF1E48
Praecipe allowed by consent to correct typographical errors in the order dated 16 June 2015. · Replace 'one week' with 'two weeks'.
Appeal: Misc. Application No. 115 of 2015 in Appeal No. 175 of 2013 disposed of on 23 June 2015; application concerned rectification of the order dated 16 June 2015.
SAT matter SATV-3FE9C687DA7547885E2211B8
Misc. Application No.205 of 2017 disposed of as not pressed with no order as to costs
Appeal: Misc. Application No.205 of 2017 in Appeal No.432 of 2015 disposed of on 03/08/2017 as not pressed
SAT matter SATV-628CC9AE7A379B0C071675FA
Misc. Application No. 115 of 2015 disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to represent · Appellant permitted to make representation to SEBI to reconsider interest demand
Appeal: Appeal No. 175 of 2013 already disposed of; Misc. Application No. 115 of 2015 therein disposed of as withdrawn on 16.06.2015

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Suresh Bharrat. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.