Spice Merchants Private Limited

SAT-appeal

• Alleged violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003. The same charges had previously been considered and rejected by the WTM.
  Delay in filing the appeals condoned and miscellaneous applications allowed · AO's common order dated 13 July 2021 quashed insofar as it concerned the appellants
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777 and 778 of 2021 allowed by SAT on 6 January 2022; AO order dated 13 July 2021 quashed qua the appellants.
• SAT matter SATV-3989F6AA4C2965A29B8187F0
  Misc. Application No. 1344 of 2021 for condonation of 882-day delay rejected for lack of sufficient cause · Appeal No. 779 of 2021 dismissed with no order as to costs
  Appeal: Appeal No. 779 of 2021 with Misc. Application No. 1344 of 2021 dismissed on 07.01.2022 for 882-day delay
• Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities market in violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations 2003.
  Delay condoned; Misc. Applications allowed · Impugned AO order quashed qua appellants
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777, 778 of 2021 allowed on 06.01.2022; AO penalty order quashed
• Alleged violation of Regulation 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 for fraudulent and unfair trade practices; same charge as in WTM show cause notice, specifics not detailed in SAT order.
  Delay condoned; Misc. Applications allowed · Impugned AO common order dated 13 July 2021 quashed qua appellants
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777 and 778 of 2021 with Misc. Applications Nos. 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1338, 1352 of 2021 allowed on 06.01.2022
• Alleged violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 relating to fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
  Delay condoned; Misc. Applications allowed · Impugned AO order quashed qua the appellants
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777, 778 of 2021 allowed on 06.01.2022; AO order quashed
• Alleged violation of Regulation 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 relating to fraudulent and unfair trade practices, same charge as in WTM proceedings.
  Delay in filing appeals condoned · Impugned AO order dated July 13, 2021 quashed qua the appellants
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777 and 778 of 2021 allowed on 06.01.2022; AO order dated 13.07.2021 quashed qua appellants
• Alleged violation of Regulation 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 for fraudulent and unfair trade practices on same set of charges as WTM proceedings.
  Impugned AO order dated July 13, 2021 quashed qua the appellants · All appeals allowed at admission stage without calling for reply
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 772, 773, 774, 775, 777, 778 of 2021 allowed vide SAT order dated 06.01.2022