Sonal H Desai
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appeals allowed and impugned SEBI orders set aside on inordinate delay and Yatin Pandya precedent (operative tail truncated)
- Appeals allowed and impugned SEBI orders set aside following Yatin Pandya HUF precedent and 12-year delay
SAT-appeal
- Alleged failure to make disclosure under PIT Regulations Regulation 13 for trades in Oregon Commercial Ltd though SAST disclosure was madeAppeals allowed and impugned SEBI orders set aside on inordinate delay and Yatin Pandya precedent (operative tail truncated)Appeal: Appeal Nos. 224 to 233 of 2022 with Misc Applications 382-389, 436-437 of 2022 decided on 31.05.2022 - allowed
- Alleged failure to make disclosure under PIT Regulations though corresponding SAST disclosure was made and available on Stock Exchange.Appeals allowed and impugned SEBI orders set aside following Yatin Pandya HUF precedent and 12-year delayAppeal: Appeal Nos. 224 to 233 of 2022 with Misc. Applications 382-389, 436-437 of 2022 decided on 31.05.2022, allowed
Source: SecMarx — Sonal H Desai. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.