Sneha Aggarwal
Penalties and directions recorded
- Matters restored to WTM file for fresh order on merits per law after hearing appellants
- Restore matters to WTM of SEBI for fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after hearing appellants
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-24E53081B373913C8B3F34AFIn paragraph 6 of the order dated 27 February 2015, replace the words “show cause notice” with “notice”. · Praecipe disposed of.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 92 and 93 of 2015 were considered by SAT on 10 March 2015; praecipe disposed of and wording in paragraph 6 of the 27 February 2015 order corrected.
- WTM restraint for alleged securities market violation (particulars not detailed); limited issue is freeze of joint demat accounts where restrained mother is second holderSEBI directed to issue show cause notice to appellants · SEBI to pass appropriate order on representations after hearingAppeal: Appeal Nos. 92 and 93 of 2015 disposed on 27.02.2015 with direction to SEBI to decide representations
- SAT matter SATV-8F55E5BE8C65B3360E6F54E4In para 6 of order dated 27/02/2015 words 'show cause notice' replaced with word 'notice' · Praecipe disposed ofAppeal: Appeal Nos. 92 and 93 of 2015; order dated 27/02/2015 corrected by order dated 10/03/2015; praecipe disposed of
- Failure to establish exclusive beneficial ownership of securities lying in respective beneficiary demat accounts held jointly with motherImpugned WTM order dated March 24, 2015 set aside · Matters restored to WTM file for fresh order on merits per law after hearing appellantsAppeal: Appeal No. 272 of 2015 and Appeal No. 273 of 2015 disposed of on 03.03.2016 by set aside and remand
- Failure to establish exclusive beneficial ownership of securities lying in respective beneficiary demat accounts opened with mother as joint holder.Set aside WTM common order dated March 24, 2015 · Restore matters to WTM of SEBI for fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after hearing appellants
- SAT matter SATV-C82CB06513A22D8B1BF8CC96SEBI directed to issue show cause notice to appellants and after hearing pass appropriate order on representations · Both Appeal Nos. 92 and 93 of 2015 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 92 and 93 of 2015 alleging SEBI inaction on representations dated 7, 8 and 22 January 2015 disposed on 27.02.2015 with direction to SEBI
Source: SecMarx — Sneha Aggarwal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.