Shri Mahendra Pandey

3 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Impugned penalty order set aside
Appellant to file reply or explanation; Board to pass orders in accordance with law

SAT-appeal

Failure to make disclosures under Regulation 13(4) read with 13(5) of PIT Regulations, 1992 while dealing in scrip of Alka Securities Ltd as alleged director/officer.
Appeal allowed; impugned adjudication order dated 17.12.2012 set aside with no costs · Matter remanded to SEBI adjudicating officer for fresh reconsideration as per law
Appeal: Appeal No. 37 of 2013 allowed on 26.06.2013; impugned AO order dated 17.12.2012 set aside and remanded
SAT matter SATV-F27CEF52AD9E329EC96028BD
Dispose Misc. Applications No. 62 and 69 of 2010 with time-bound directions · SEBI to issue Section 11B show cause notice by 31 August 2010 if it proposes to proceed
Appeal: Misc. Applications No. 62 and 69 of 2010 in Appeal No. 231 of 2009 disposed on 27.7.2010
Failure by an alleged promoter director/officer to make prescribed disclosures to the company and stock exchange under Regulations 13(4) read with 13(5) after substantial trading in Alka Securities shares.
Impugned penalty order set aside · Matter remanded to SEBI/Board for fresh consideration
Appeal: Appeal No. 178 of 2011 decided by SAT on 22 December 2011; impugned order set aside and matter remanded

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Shri Mahendra Pandey. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.