Shri Ketan Babulal Shah
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-89AF48F9D36817F76E633A41
- Fictitious trades leading to adjudication penalty; quantum of penalty disputed qua volume of fictitious trade.Impugned AO common order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua appellants · Matter restored to file of Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 with no order as to costs
- SAT matter SATV-64D10CA05D1E3DDB0B9FC951Appeal: Review Application No. 1 of 2016 in Appeal No. 3 of 2015 and Review Application No. 2 of 2016 in Appeal No. 4 of 2015 before SAT Mumbai, order dated 15.02.2016
- Alleged fictitious trades resulting in AO penalty; quantum disputed qua volume of fictitious tradesImpugned AO order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua the appellants · Matter restored to file of Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 by consent remand to AO
- Fictitious trades leading to adjudication penalty, with dispute on findings and quantum vis-a-vis trade volumeImpugned AO order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua the appellants · Matter restored to Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 by consent remand to AO
Source: SecMarx — Shri Ketan Babulal Shah. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.