Shri Jigar Praful Ghoghari
SAT-appeal
- Fictitious trades leading to adjudication penalty; quantum of penalty disputed qua volume of fictitious trade.Impugned AO common order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua appellants · Matter restored to file of Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 with no order as to costs
- Alleged fictitious trades resulting in AO penalty; quantum disputed qua volume of fictitious tradesImpugned AO order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua the appellants · Matter restored to file of Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 by consent remand to AO
- Fictitious trades leading to adjudication penalty, with dispute on findings and quantum vis-a-vis trade volumeImpugned AO order dated September 23, 2014 quashed and set aside qua the appellants · Matter restored to Adjudicating Officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 of 2015 disposed of on 20.01.2016 by consent remand to AO
Source: SecMarx — Shri Jigar Praful Ghoghari. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.