Sharmila Raj Thackeray

7 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

SEBI to consider an application filed within two weeks and preferably pass orders within six weeks thereafter
Appellants may file rejoinders within two weeks thereafter
Appeals listed for orders on condonation of delay on 10 August 2021
Appellants to pursue application before NSE with further evidence if any

SAT-appeal

Appellants alleged that SMC Global Securities, Sunchan Securities and Sunil Mansinghani connived to fraudulently use appellants’ funds and securities for their own gains.
Miscellaneous Application and Appeal No. 182 of 2016 withdrawn and disposed of · Appellants permitted to approach SEBI for redressal of remaining grievances
Appeal: Appeal No. 182 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 127 of 2016 disposed of on 16 June 2016 on withdrawal; Respondent No. 2’s Appeal No. 152 of 2013 was dismissed on 31 January 2014.
SAT matter SATV-03ADFB92E5555DAE5FE9C089
Miscellaneous application for condonation of 1350-day delay rejected · Appeal dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay
Appeal: Appeal No. 118 of 2020 dismissed on 24 September 2021 after rejection of Misc. Application No. 601 of 2020 for condonation of delay.
SAT matter SATV-DF1AD3681582BFAB11926C33
Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 for recall rejected summarily as patently misconceived · Tribunal order dated October 24, 2016 not recalled
Appeal: Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 in Appeal No. 310 of 2016 decided on 24.09.2021 - recall rejected
SAT matter SATV-6ED5A1BADA133318AFEFB2E5
Respondents to file replies to the delay application and other applications within three weeks from 1 July 2021 · Appellants may file rejoinders within two weeks thereafter
Appeal: Appeal No. 118 of 2020, along with Appeal No. 310 of 2016 and Appeal No. 165 of 2020; procedural order dated 1 July 2021, listed for delay-condonation applications on 10 August 2021
Clearing member SMC Global allegedly misused securities of Sunchan's clients including appellants in collusion with trading member Sunchan and made wrongful gains; disgorgement/restitution sought.
Appeal No. 165 of 2020 dismissed as lacking merit and misuse of process · No order as to costs
SAT matter SATV-AAB7F46CF7F8F49161899F65
Appeal No. 310 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 allowed to be withdrawn · All contentions of both sides kept open
Appeal: Appeal No. 310 of 2016 with Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 disposed as withdrawn on 24.10.2016
SAT matter SATV-CC6A1E1341CAC60C56EB4CF3
56 days delay in filing appeal condoned and Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 disposed · Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed as infructuous with no order as to costs
Appeal: Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed on 28.06.2016 as infructuous; Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 for condonation of 56 days delay allowed

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Sharmila Raj Thackeray. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.