Sharadaraj Tradefin Ltd.
Penalties and directions recorded
- Tribunal declined to recall its earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution.
- Time extended for each appellant to pay Rs.25,000 costs to SEBI until 3 July 2018.
- Each appellant must pay additional costs of Rs.5,000 to SEBI by 3 July 2018.
- Applications seeking recall of earlier dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were rejected.
- Applications seeking recall of dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were dismissed.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-02537CC288E8BE56EE7E1E6FMiscellaneous Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019; connected miscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecution on 04 October 2019
- SAT matter SATV-02D4EE8AF4C5BA2E2FE809F5Miscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecution because no applicant appeared to press them.Appeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed on 04 October 2019 for want of prosecution.
- SAT matter SATV-0A3F9281E29BED5CF7DEEC98Miscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed on 4 October 2019 for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-0C7080507927C0BB8FE9B491Miscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019, in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019, dismissed on 04 October 2019 for want of prosecution.
- SAT matter SATV-15F04F63C8C1E1FE64FD74A721 applications seeking recall and restoration were dismissed. · Tribunal declined to recall its earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019; recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019; third recall applications dismissed on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-174F11043B57106542428EFCTime extended for each appellant to pay Rs.25,000 costs to SEBI until 3 July 2018. · Each appellant must pay additional costs of Rs.5,000 to SEBI by 3 July 2018.Appeal: Miscellaneous Applications Nos.146-165 of 2018 in Appeals Nos.14-33 of 2018 disposed of on 19 June 2018; fresh appeals permitted subject to conditions.
- SAT matter SATV-1CABE2F41BA76FE00FF45C62Applications seeking recall of earlier dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were rejected. · The Tribunal found a casual approach and did not accept the appellants' lack-of-knowledge contention.Appeal: Appeals against the AO order dated 16 August 2017 were withdrawn, refiled belatedly, dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019; recall application dismissed on 04 October 2019; further recall applications decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-26F525878CD8436A7E1128EBMiscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318 to 338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281 to 300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed on 04 October 2019 for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-2E1F304E856FB65EE0A8A044Applications seeking recall of dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were dismissed. · Tribunal found a casual approach and lack of diligence in pursuing the appeals.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019, including 21 connected matters; appeals had earlier been dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, and recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019.
- SAT matter SATV-2FDF89358A1E05A0B2035A12Applications for recall and restoration were dismissed due to the appellants' casual and delayed conduct. · Earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution remained undisturbed.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281, 282, 283, 284-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, with recall applications dismissed on 04 October 2019; present recall applications dismissed on 06 September 2021
- SAT matter SATV-31F0BA549BB5E17A9867F085Miscellaneous applications dismissed for want of prosecution.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281 to 300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 were before SAT; associated miscellaneous applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019 for want of prosecution.
- SAT matter SATV-23222AB32B17E2CD95408878Applications seeking recall of dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were rejected. · Tribunal found a casual approach and no satisfactory explanation for the delay and repeated non-prosecution.Appeal: Twenty-one recall applications in appeal lodging matters were heard and rejected on 06 September 2021; underlying appeals had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.
- SAT matter SATV-32877FBFFEABF9C53A938094Order dated 06.09.2021 deciding recall applications seeking recall of 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 orders · Tribunal recorded very casual approach and disbelieved plea of unawareness of dismissalAppeal: Misc. Appl. Nos. 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019 and recall application dismissed on 04.10.2019; restoration sought, decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-507CC1156EE2DCB34294678CAll Misc Applications dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for applicantsAppeal: Misc Applications Nos 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No 107 of 2019 decided on 04.10.2019 - dismissed for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-51C5F8A52D57C04875D0279DAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 seeking recall of SAT orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals; decision dated 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-820725883D7EE69F4EDA99A8Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-802E3949537146785F142FEDMisc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-325 and 326-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-8F4F2BFC68C2A680F8CC17F3All Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-325 and 326-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-89B35167D6FF4152B1427EE721 Misc. Applications for recall of SAT orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals rejected/dismissed for casual approach and want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-9E5F9AC61E73B5CAC2B899CARecall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 sought for restoration of appeals; Tribunal held casual approach and disbelieved unawareness plea
- SAT matter SATV-A031413298952EA43F34774CMisc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Applications No. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-9509843CE7C1D6150103B25DMisc Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019; Misc Applications dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-9E351843AA923299A91CA3ECMisc Applications dismissed for want of prosecution for non-appearanceAppeal: Misc Application Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-B2E501F0571150EDE8822B95Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-B298D04E4D46714BA96E5B9121 recall applications for recall of SAT orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals heard; Tribunal notes casual approachAppeal: Misc. Applications 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 seeking recall of SAT dismissal orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019; decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-4882E26B527D596CB07D677CApplications seeking recall and restoration of the appeals were dismissed. · Tribunal found a casual approach and lack of prosecution by the appellants.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019, and the present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-C7DB37A9700F98A9B9C7F9CDMisc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-C5445018E54B8447C5431FE7Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-510691100363A3CCBF0FDD35Applications for recall and restoration were rejected/dismissed. · Appeals had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.Appeal: Multiple appeal lodging matters, including Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, and recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019. Present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-D833C4DC0EA2A036B393D39521 recall applications seek recall of SAT orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals · Tribunal noted casual approach and disbelieved plea of unawareness of dismissal for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-F8FF364E0A1CA02F578A2E9521 misc applications seeking recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals taken up on 06.09.2021 · Tribunal observed casual approach and unexplained delay by appellants in pursuing matterAppeal: Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 against AO order dated 16.08.2017 dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019; recall dismissed on 04.10.2019; fresh recall filed 30.10.2020 decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-65B279BC3A2CA858EC9D905BApplications for recall and restoration of the appeals were dismissed.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019, and the present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-516DE8A1D8E15C34FB16AD54Tribunal considered 21 applications for recall of orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals; observed casual approach (full operative part truncated)
- SAT matter SATV-5AC4C27E57B8CCFD4F94A159Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution for non-appearanceAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-5F487001FE3DCD4DAFD12134Misc applications for recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals rejected
- SAT matter SATV-ACA54A4A990F061139EA253921 applications seek recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals · Tribunal notes casual prosecution and rejects unawareness plea as afterthought
- SAT matter SATV-D256D7CFA9C2A17C19813A13Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution for non-appearanceAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-D7E37B39384CAC46064EE0D8Misc. Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc. Applications No. 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No. 107 of 2019 disposed on 04.10.2019 as dismissed for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-ECC86A5DA25800DD6B1535DBAppeal (L) No. 282 of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Misc. Application No. 98 of 2019 in Appeal (L) No. 282 of 2018 disposed on 05.04.2019 as dismissed for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-E0175FAA4F93E4E72315AE08Misc Applications dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicantsAppeal: Misc Applications Nos 318-338 of 2019 in Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300 of 2018 and Appeal No 107 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 04.10.2019
- SAT matter SATV-F92293933C4C83E99EB17ABCAppeal: Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300/2018 and 107/2019 vs AO order 16.08.2017 dismissed 05.04.2019; recall dismissed 04.10.2019; fresh Misc 603-622/2020 and 994/2021 filed 30.10.2020 decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-E72C0765E84A4AFCE7789AE2Appeal: Misc. Applications 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019; recall dismissed on 04.10.2019; restoration sought, decision on 06.09.2021
Source: SecMarx — Sharadaraj Tradefin Ltd.. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.