Sanjeev Arora
Penalties and directions recorded
- Penalty reduced to Rs.1 lakh.
SAT-appeal
- Alleged misleading public announcements, delayed disclosures, irregular preferential allotments and inappropriate accounting practices intended to present a rosy picture, manipulate the share price and violate the PFUTP Regulations, 2003.Impugned WTM order upheld on merits. · Three-year restraint reduced to restraint only up to 31 August 2017, recognizing approximately 20 months already undergone.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 100, 101, 102 and 103 of 2016 disposed of by common SAT order dated 31 August 2017.
- Misleading corporate announcements, delayed disclosures, irregular preferential allotments and inaccurate accounting practices allegedly created a rosy picture, manipulated the company's share price and violated the PFUTP Regulations, 2003.Appeals disposed of with the WTM order upheld on merits. · Three-year market-access restraint reduced to the period already undergone, ending on 31 August 2017.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 100, 101, 102 and 103 of 2016 disposed of by SAT on 31 August 2017.
- Misleading corporate announcements, delayed disclosures, irregular preferential allotments and inappropriate accounting to present rosy picture and manipulate share price.WTM order dated 13 January 2016 upheld on merits for PFUTP violation · 3-year direct/indirect securities market restraint reduced to period already undergoneAppeal: Appeal Nos. 100, 101, 102 and 103 of 2016 disposed by common SAT order dated 31.08.2017
- Disseminating misleading information, suppressing negative information, making aggressive positive announcements, and influencing RPIL's share price through personal and wash trades.Impugned adjudication order dated 31 August 2012 upheld with modification. · Penalty reduced to Rs.1 lakh.Appeal: Appeal No. 216 of 2012 disposed of on 7 May 2013; penalty reduced and impugned order otherwise upheld.
- Alleged misleading corporate announcements, delayed disclosures, irregular preferential allotments and inaccurate accounting practices designed to present a falsely positive picture and manipulate the company's share price, violating the PFUTP Regulations, 2003.WTM's finding of violations was upheld on merits. · Three-year restraint was reduced to the period already undergone, ending on 31 August 2017.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 100, 101, 102 and 103 of 2016 disposed of by SAT on 31 August 2017; restraint period restricted to the date of decision.
Source: SecMarx — Sanjeev Arora. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.