Sanjay Kumar Gupta

SAT-appeal

• Alleged participation in an irregular preferential allotment and subsequent manipulation of Padmini Technologies’ scrip by facilitating disposal of preferential allotment shares and creating artificial volumes and prices.
  SAT examined the show-cause notice and found that it did not disclose a culpable charge against the appellant. · Appeal against SEBI’s five-year restraint order was allowed; the impugned order was set aside insofar as it concerned the appellant.
  Appeal: Appeal No. 107 of 2007, decided on 8 July 2008; appeal against SEBI WTM order dated 31 March 2007 allowed.
• SAT matter SATV-EC5A48EAFF24DD9C7A58E87A
  List Appeals No. 286, 287 and 369 of 2022 on 17 November 2022 · Parties to act on digitally signed copy; certified copy available from Registry on payment
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 286, 287 and 369 of 2022 pending before SAT; adjourned to 17 November 2022 vide order dated 16.11.2022