Runicha Merchant Pvt. Ltd.
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appeals challenged the impugned order dated 6 March 2013 imposing penalties; remaining operative merits disposition is not included in the provided text.
- Appeals challenged the common impugned order dated 6 March 2013 imposing penalties; operative final disposal portion is not included in the supplied text.
- AO penalties under challenge: Rs 25 lakh on Scope Vyapar and Rs 3 lakh each on 20 others
- Appeals challenging the penalties were dismissed.
- Penalties imposed by SEBI's order dated 6 March 2013 were upheld.
SAT-appeal
- Alleged creation of artificial volume and misleading appearance of trading in Rich Universe Networking Ltd. through connected-entity off-market transfers and reversal, circular, synchronized trades at progressively higher prices.Miscellaneous Applications 123 to 128 of 2013 allowed and delay condoned. · Appeals challenged the impugned order dated 6 March 2013 imposing penalties; remaining operative merits disposition is not included in the provided text.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 189-194, 94, 107 and 108 of 2013 heard on 24 January 2014; decision dated 31 January 2014. The provided extract does not state final disposal directions.
- Manipulative and fraudulent trading in RUNL shares through connected entities, off-market transfers, reversal, circular and synchronized trades, creating artificial volume and misleading appearance and causing price rise.Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 123 to 128 of 2013 for condonation of delay were allowed. · Appeals challenged the common impugned order dated 6 March 2013 imposing penalties; operative final disposal portion is not included in the supplied text.Appeal: SAT Appeals Nos. 189-194, 94, 107 and 108 of 2013; hearing on 24 January 2014 and decision dated 31 January 2014. The supplied text does not include the final disposal directions.
- Creating artificial volume and misleading appearance of trading and price rise in Rich Universe Networking Ltd. via off-market transfers followed by synchronized/circular/reversal trades at incrementally higher prices.Misc. Applications 123 to 128 of 2013 for condonation of delay allowedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 189-194, 94, 107, 108 of 2013 against adjudication order dated March 6, 2013; Appeals 189-194 filed Oct 28, 2013 after 45 days; delay condoned 31 Jan 2014
- Manipulation of Rich Universe Networking Ltd. shares through connected entities, off-market transfers and reversal/circular/synchronized trades, creating artificial volume and a misleading appearance of trading and price rise.Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 123 to 128 of 2013 seeking condonation of delay were allowed.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 189 to 194, 94, 107 and 108 of 2013 were heard; six delayed appeals were admitted after condonation. Decision dated 31 January 2014.
- Group of 21 connected entities executed large off-market transfers and reversal circular/synchronized trades in Rich Universe Networking Ltd. to create artificial volume and push price higher.Misc. Applications Nos. 123-128 of 2013 allowed and delay in filing Appeals 189-194 of 2013 condoned · AO penalties under challenge: Rs 25 lakh on Scope Vyapar and Rs 3 lakh each on 20 othersAppeal: SAT Appeals Nos. 189-194, 94, 107-108 of 2013 heard 24.01.2014, decided 31.01.2014; Misc. Apps 123-128 of 2013 for condonation allowed
- Alleged creation of artificial volume and misleading appearance of trading in RUNL through connected entities, off-market transfers and reversal/circular/synchronized trades at incrementally higher prices.Miscellaneous Applications 123 to 128 of 2013 for condonation of delay were allowed. · Appeals challenging the penalties were dismissed.Appeal: SAT Appeals 189-194, 94, 107 and 108 of 2013; heard 24 January 2014 and decided 31 January 2014; appeals dismissed.
- Group of 21 connected entities executed large off-market transfers and reversal/circular/synchronized on-market trades at incrementally higher prices to create artificial volume and misleading appearance in Rich Universe Network Ltd.Misc. Applications Nos. 123-128 of 2013 for condonation of delay in filing Appeals 189-194 of 2013 allowed · AO finding that charges proved except Noticee Nos. 8 and 20 retained in impugned order: Rs 25 lakh on Noticee No.1 for lead role, Rs 3 lakh each on Noticees 2-21 for supportive roleAppeal: Appeals Nos. 189-194, 94, 107-108 of 2013 against SEBI AO order dated March 6, 2013; Appeals 189-194 filed Oct 28, 2013 beyond 45-day limit, delay condoned via Misc. Apps 123-128; Heard 24.01.2014, Decided 31.01.2014
- Manipulation of Rich Universe Networking Ltd. shares via connected group using large off-market transfers reversed by synchronized/circular trades at higher prices creating artificial volume and price rise.Misc. Applications No. 123 to 128 of 2013 for condonation of delay in Appeals 189-194 of 2013 allowedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 189-194, 94, 107-108 of 2013 against AO order dated March 6, 2013; delay condoned; heard 24.01.2014, decided 31.01.2014
- Group of 21 connected entities manipulated Rich Universe Networking Ltd shares via large off-market transfers and reversal synchronized/circular trades creating artificial volume and price rise.Misc. Applications No. 123 to 128 of 2013 allowed condoning delay in filing Appeal Nos. 189 to 194 of 2013Appeal: Appeals 189-194, 94, 107-108 of 2013 against SEBI order dated March 6, 2013; heard 24.01.2014, decided 31.01.2014; delay condoned
Source: SecMarx — Runicha Merchant Pvt. Ltd.. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.