Rohini Vijaysingh Patwardhan

SAT-appeal

• SAT matter SATV-7D273A84DB177768EA71AB5C
  SEBI to consider applicant applications dated 27 Nov 2015 and 27 Feb 2016 and pass appropriate order · Misc. Application No. 58 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costs
  Appeal: Misc. Application No. 58 of 2016 in Appeal No. 449 of 2015 disposed of on 27.04.2016
• SAT matter SATV-5DFA2803264B4740FEB3A9D2
  129-day delay in filing the appeal condoned · Appeal disposed of based on SEBI's statement that a final order would be passed within eight weeks from 30 October 2015
  Appeal: Appeal No. 449 of 2015 disposed of by SAT on 30 October 2015; Miscellaneous Application No. 310 of 2015 for condonation of delay also disposed of
• Alleged participation in a manipulative scheme involving Mishka’s preferential allotment and trading activity intended to generate false long-term capital gains for preferential allottees and promoter-related entities.
  Appeal No. 225 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 295 of 2016 disposed of without deciding the merits. · Appellant may represent to SEBI regarding release of assets attached in excess of Rs. 2 crore.
  Appeal: Appeal No. 225 of 2016, decided on 29 December 2016; appeal and Misc. Application No. 295 of 2016 disposed of. August 26, 2016 SEBI order was not challenged in this appeal.
• Challenge to SEBI's ex-parte ad-interim restraint order prohibiting 129 entities, including the appellant, from entering the securities market pending investigation.
  SEBI WTM granted six weeks from 25 May 2016 to pass an order concerning the appellant. · If the WTM failed to pass the order within six weeks, the 17 April 2015 ex-parte ad-interim order would automatically end against the appellant.
  Appeal: Miscellaneous Application No. 85 of 2016 in Appeal No. 449 of 2015 disposed of on 25 May 2016; Appeal No. 449 of 2015 had earlier been disposed of on 30 October 2015.