Rajesh Jaiswal

6 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-12CE20A85EE8E35BC20C3AF9
Appellant permitted to make a representation to SEBI. · SEBI directed to consider the representation and pass an appropriate order expeditiously.
Appeal: Appeal No. 314 of 2016 disposed of on 9 November 2016 after the appellant did not press the appeal and sought permission to make a representation to SEBI.
SAT matter SATV-1AF90B58749442AF501B6A2F
Leave granted to amend the memorandum of appeal · Matter listed by consent on 20 September 2024
Appeal: Appeal No. 521 of 2024; order dated 21 August 2024 granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal and listed the matter for 20 September 2024; not disposed on merits in this order.
Illegal mobilisation by Cell Industries Limited through issuance of non-convertible debentures and redeemable preferential shares requiring refund with 15% interest.
Set aside RO communication dated 13 January 2022 · Direct RO to consider chartered accountant certificate and proceed thereon
Appeal: Appeal No. 95 of 2022 allowed on 03.03.2022; Misc. Application No. 156 of 2022 disposed of accordingly
SAT matter SATV-3F519E71C69C24C2F27CFE7F
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn · Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 897 and 898 of 2024 disposed of
Appeal: Appeal No. 521 of 2024 was withdrawn and dismissed by SAT on 20 September 2024.
Illegal collection of Rs 15.61 crore from investors leading to WTM direction to refund with 15% p.a. interest from due date till payment.
Appellants at liberty to represent to SEBI on mode of refunds made and balance refunds per impugned order · SEBI to consider extension of time and reconsider restraint order if full details furnished
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 300 of 2016 and 317 of 2016 disposed on 09.11.2016 with liberty to represent to SEBI; no costs
Illegal collection of Rs 15.61 crore from investors; WTM directed refund with 15% p.a. interest from due date till payment.
Both appeals disposed with liberty to appellants to make representation to SEBI · SEBI to consider extension of time for balance refunds with interest if full details furnished
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 300 of 2016 and 317 of 2016 disposed on 09.11.2016 with no order as to costs

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Rajesh Jaiswal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.