Rajan Hemchandra Gupte
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appellants to pursue application before NSE with further evidence if any
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-DF1AD3681582BFAB11926C33Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 for recall rejected summarily as patently misconceived · Tribunal order dated October 24, 2016 not recalledAppeal: Misc. Application No. 25 of 2020 in Appeal No. 310 of 2016 decided on 24.09.2021 - recall rejected
- SAT matter SATV-AAB7F46CF7F8F49161899F65Appeal No. 310 of 2016 and Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 allowed to be withdrawn · All contentions of both sides kept openAppeal: Appeal No. 310 of 2016 with Misc. Application No. 249 of 2016 disposed as withdrawn on 24.10.2016
- SAT matter SATV-CC6A1E1341CAC60C56EB4CF356 days delay in filing appeal condoned and Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 disposed · Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 298 of 2014 disposed on 28.06.2016 as infructuous; Misc. Application No. 139 of 2014 for condonation of 56 days delay allowed
Source: SecMarx — Rajan Hemchandra Gupte. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.