Radheyshyam Agarwal

2 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Appeal No.126 of 2012 held not maintainable and dismissed - appellant not person aggrieved under Section 15T

SAT-appeal

Promoter group disclosed declining stake but actually increased shareholding without disclosure; 92 of 100 entities prima-facie in violation of takeover/disclosure framework.
Appeal No.126 of 2012 held not maintainable and dismissed - appellant not person aggrieved under Section 15T · SEBI preliminary objection on maintainability upheld
Appeal: Appeal No.126 of 2012 decided on 18.09.2012 - dismissed as not maintainable
Promoters of Bank of Rajasthan with PACs allegedly made fraudulent disclosures that promoter shareholding reduced per RBI circular when it had actually increased.
Delay in filing Appeal No. 114 of 2013 condoned; Misc. Application No. 61 of 2013 disposed · Appeal No. 114 of 2013 dismissed with no order as to costs
Appeal: Appeal No. 114 of 2013 dismissed on 30.06.2014 (reserved 23.06.2014); Misc. Application No. 61 of 2013 allowed

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Radheyshyam Agarwal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.