Rachna Uppal
Penalties and directions recorded
- AO order dated 30.09.2014 imposed Rs 15 lakh for Reg 11(1)/14(1) violation (2000-2001)
- AO order dated 30.09.2014 imposed Rs 15 lakh for Reg 11(2)/14(1) violation (15.09.2005)
- AO order dated 01.10.2014 imposed Rs 20 lakh for Reg 11(2)/14(1) violation (Mar 2010)
SAT-appeal
- Acquisition of shares exceeding the applicable 5% threshold by acquirers and persons acting in concert without making the required public announcement under the SAST Regulations.Common order disposing of 14 appeals; operative appellate outcome is not included in the supplied text.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 470, 471, 472, 474-479, 481-485 of 2015 heard together; final disposal portion is absent from the supplied text.
- Acquisition of shares exceeding 5% creeping limit by persons holding 15% to 75% without making public announcement under Reg 11 read with Reg 14 of SAST Regulations, 1997Appeal: 14 appeals Nos. 470, 471, 472, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485 of 2015 heard together and disposed by common SAT order dated 14.10.2016
- SAT matter SATV-759D5380E5680C5B8B09A7D1Appellants permitted to withdraw appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 of 2015 and 289 of 2015 disposed as withdrawn with liberty to refile vide SAT order dated 9/9/2015
- SAT matter SATV-8803ED048A6E99A0DEE225DCAppellants permitted to withdraw appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty and disposed of on 9 September 2015
- SAT matter SATV-E06BABC8DBED96E8C65287A7Permitted withdrawal of all 7 appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals within four weeks from 9/9/2015 · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty and disposed on 9/9/2015 with no costs
- SAT matter SATV-DF9563791EE16EC6697B087EAppellants permitted to withdraw appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty to refile; disposed on 9/9/2015 with no costs
- SAT matter SATV-EEC5CC5E60781D8C0E044CF1Permitted counsel for appellants to withdraw all 7 appeals · Granted liberty to file fresh appeals within four weeks from 9 September 2015Appeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals; disposed of on 9/9/2015 with no order as to costs
- Creeping acquisition exceeding 5% in 12 months by persons holding 15%-75% without public announcement under Reg 11(1)/11(2) r/w 14(1) SAST Regulations, 1997.AO order dated 30.09.2014 imposed Rs 15 lakh for Reg 11(1)/14(1) violation (2000-2001) · AO order dated 30.09.2014 imposed Rs 15 lakh for Reg 11(2)/14(1) violation (15.09.2005)Appeal: 14 appeals No. 470,471,472,474,475,476,477,478,479,481,482,483,484,485 of 2015 disposed by common SAT order dated 14.10.2016
- SAT matter SATV-81CB87B741098AA25AF03634Appeals permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 disposed of as withdrawn on 9 September 2015 with liberty to refile
- SAT matter SATV-A2598C635A24F2BA0D2A61A4Permitted withdrawal of appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals · All 7 appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 289 of 2015 disposed of as withdrawn on 9 September 2015 with liberty to refile
- Creeping acquisition exceeding 5% in 12 months by persons holding 15%-75% without public announcement under Reg 11 read with Reg 14 SAST Regulations, 1997.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 470,471,472,474,475,476,477,478,479,481,482,483,484,485 of 2015 disposed by common SAT order dated 14.10.2016
Source: SecMarx — Rachna Uppal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.