Pradeep Kumar Bansal
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appellant to pay Rs. 25 lakh
- Appellant to pay Rs. 2.5 lakh towards legal expenses
- Appellant voluntarily suspended for five years commencing 23 July 2003
- Appeal dismissed; AO penalty order upheld with no order as to costs
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-36FA7ACB9577415C59E6C60FConsent terms accepted and Appeal No. 113 of 2006 disposed of accordingly · Appellant to pay Rs. 25 lakhAppeal: Appeal No. 113 of 2006 disposed of on 9 June 2008 pursuant to approved consent terms
- Violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 and violation of Code of Conduct prescribed for stock brokers.Appeal dismissed; AO penalty order upheld with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 74 of 2011 decided on 07.06.2011 - dismissed
Source: SecMarx — Pradeep Kumar Bansal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.