Paterson Commodities Private Limited
Penalties and directions recorded
- Matters listed on 6 June 2022
- Impugned WTM orders against the brokers were quashed.
- Matters remitted to the WTM for fresh decision after hearing the brokers.
- Adverse observations and findings against NSEL were expunged and cannot be used against it.
- Impugned WTM orders against the brokers were quashed.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-038F68C30CCE6FAE4BE9BBD6Appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 granted three weeks to file rejoinder · Matters listed on 6 June 2022Appeal: Interim procedural order dated 8 April 2022 in Appeal Nos. 672 of 2021, 708 of 2021, 751 of 2021, 756 of 2021, 4 of 2022, 8 of 2022 and 18 of 2022; Appeal No. 672 of 2021 listed for 6 June 2022
- SEBI rejected or cancelled the brokers' commodity-broker registration applications on the ground that they were not fit and proper persons to hold registration certificates.Impugned WTM orders against the brokers were quashed. · Matters remitted to the WTM for fresh decision after hearing the brokers.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 672/2021, 708/2021, 751/2021, 756/2021, 18/2022, 4/2022, 8/2022, 169/2022, 382/2022, 383/2022, 384/2022, 385/2022 and 386/2022 allowed and disposed on 20 July 2022.
- SAT matter SATV-351447999EAA03309FE1D62EThree weeks' time granted to the appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 to file rejoinder · Appeal No. 672 of 2021 listed on 6 June 2022Appeal: Procedural order in Appeal Nos. 672 of 2021, 708 of 2021, 751 of 2021, 756 of 2021, 4 of 2022, 8 of 2022 and 18 of 2022; Appeal No. 672 of 2021 granted three weeks to file rejoinder and listed for 6 June 2022.
- The commodity brokers' registration applications were rejected or registrations cancelled on the ground that they were not fit and proper persons. NSEL challenged adverse observations made against it in the impugned orders.Impugned WTM orders against the brokers were quashed. · Matters remitted to the WTM for fresh decision after hearing the brokers.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 672, 708, 751 and 756 of 2021; 18 and 4 of 2022; 8, 169, 382, 383, 384, 385 and 386 of 2022 were allowed on 20 July 2022 and remitted for fresh consideration.
- Rejection or cancellation of commodity-broker registration on the ground that the appellants were not fit and proper persons. Appeals also challenged adverse ex parte findings concerning NSEL.Impugned WTM orders against the commodity-broker appellants quashed. · Matters remitted to the WTM for fresh decision after hearing the brokers and considering the SAT's observations.Appeal: Appeals Nos. 672, 708, 751, 756 of 2021; 18 and 4 of 2022; and 8, 169, 382, 383, 384, 385 and 386 of 2022 allowed on 20 July 2022; matters remitted to WTM.
- WTM rejected/cancelled applications for registration as commodity broker holding appellants not 'fit and proper person' in NSEL-related matter.Impugned WTM orders against brokers quashed; brokers' appeals allowed · Matters remitted to WTM to decide afresh per SAT order 09.06.2022 after hearing brokers with all issues openAppeal: Appeal Nos. 672, 708, 751, 756 of 2021, 18, 4, 8, 169, 382-386 of 2022 with misc. applications reserved 18.07.2022, decided 20.07.2022 - all allowed and remanded/expunged
- SAT matter SATV-3BD333459BD510048217CED9Modification applications allowed · Line 5 in paragraph 2 of order dated July 20, 2022 modified to add word cancelled after rejectedAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeals Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022
- SAT matter SATV-39BC284E30982B90E09E9FDAThree weeks time allowed to appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 to file rejoinder · Matter listed on June 6, 2022; parties to act on digitally signed copyAppeal: Appeal Nos. 672/2021, 708/2021, 751/2021, 756/2021, 4/2022, 8/2022, 18/2022 pending before SAT; adjourned to 06.06.2022
- SAT matter SATV-3EA6057F8FD6CE7765ED8EB5Appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 granted three weeks to file rejoinder · Appeal No. 672 of 2021 listed on 6 June 2022Appeal: Procedural order dated 8 April 2022 in Appeal Nos. 672 of 2021, 708 of 2021, 751 of 2021, 756 of 2021, 4 of 2022, 8 of 2022 and 18 of 2022; Appeal No. 672 of 2021 listed for 6 June 2022
- SAT matter SATV-687FA25487EE8A2D95DDA6F6Three weeks' time allowed to appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 to file rejoinder · Matter listed on June 6, 2022
- SAT matter SATV-77FF4FB6A6EE569E0345E2BCModification applications allowed; word 'cancelled' added after word 'rejected' in line 5 paragraph 2 of order dated July 20, 2022 · Necessary correction carried out in original order by benchAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeal Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022
- SAT matter SATV-817DCFD37FF56F571C7DD671Modification applications allowed; word 'cancelled' added after 'rejected' in line 5 paragraph 2 of order dated 20 July 2022 · Parties to act on digitally signed copy by Private Secretary; certified copy available from Registry on paymentAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeal Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022
- Rejection of commodity broker registration under Intermediaries Regulations on ground appellant is not 'fit and proper person' in NSEL-linked context.WTM rejection orders against brokers quashed · Brokers appeals allowed and remitted to WTM for fresh decision per 09.06.2022 Geofin ruling after hearingAppeal: Appeal Nos. 672/2021, 708/2021, 751/2021, 756/2021, 18/2022, 4/2022, 8/2022, 169/2022, 382-386/2022 allowed and disposed on 20.07.2022 (reserved 18.07.2022)
- SAT matter SATV-CC0B3A046C57A3FC0CFCFE9BModification applications allowed; word 'cancelled' added after 'rejected' in line 5 para 2 of 20 July 2022 order · Parties to act on digitally signed copy; certified copy available from Registry on paymentAppeal: Misc. Applications 863,876,884,885,886,898 of 2022 in Appeals 708/2021,4/2022,756/2021,8/2022,169/2022,18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022
- SAT matter SATV-D2EDF84F08BD5C153E32F92AThree weeks time allowed to appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 to file rejoinder · Matter listed on June 6, 2022Appeal: Appeal Nos. 672/2021, 708/2021, 751/2021, 756/2021, 4/2022, 8/2022, 18/2022 with connected Misc. Applications pending; adjourned to 06.06.2022
- SAT matter SATV-D03E6ACBA0FC35517C17E7C7Modification applications allowed; word 'cancelled' added after 'rejected' in line 5 paragraph 2 of order dated July 20, 2022 · Correction carried out in original order; parties to act on digitally signed copy; certified copy available from RegistryAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeals Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed vide SAT order dated 14.10.2022
- SAT matter SATV-D559C7CCAE3BAE70F0C37C10Three weeks time to appellant in Appeal No. 672 of 2021 to file rejoinder · List matters on June 6, 2022Appeal: Appeal Nos. 672/2021, 708/2021, 751/2021, 756/2021, 4/2022, 8/2022, 18/2022 pending; only rejoinder time granted, next date June 6, 2022, no disposal on 08.04.2022
- SAT matter SATV-6E13464B09961C5A16989504effect and operation of impugned order shall remain stayed during pendency of appeal · connected with Appeal No. 672 of 2021Appeal: Appeal No. 4 of 2022 with Misc. Application No. 1414 of 2021 pending; stay granted on 18.01.2022; next listing 18 February 2022
- SAT matter SATV-8CC0D239E70A838346FA78A2Modification applications allowed · Line 5 in paragraph 2 of SAT order dated July 20, 2022 modified to add word 'cancelled' after 'rejected'Appeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeals Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022
- SAT matter SATV-8C35D0E0C7A052B101CDAD82Modification applications allowed · Line 5 in paragraph 2 of SAT order dated July 20, 2022 modified to add word 'cancelled' after 'rejected'Appeal: Misc. Application Nos. 863, 876, 884, 885, 886, 898 of 2022 in Appeal Nos. 708/2021, 4/2022, 756/2021, 8/2022, 169/2022, 18/2022 allowed on 14.10.2022 modifying SAT order dated 20.07.2022
Source: SecMarx — Paterson Commodities Private Limited. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.