Nishath Shailesh Gupte
Penalties and directions recorded
- Parties to contact Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on video vs physical hearing
SAT-appeal
- Underlying WTM order restrained appellant from accessing securities market for 7 years; specific violation not detailed in SAT orderApproval granted in terms of Regulation 24(2) of Settlement Regulations, 2018 · Appeal No.185 of 2020 disposed in terms of settlement with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No.185 of 2020 against WTM order dated 10 January 2020 disposed on 4.11.2020 in terms of settlement; Misc. Application No.428 of 2020 disposed
- Unspecified trades in 2010 penalised with Rs 1 crore by WTM order dated 10 January 2020Delay condoned in Appeal Lodging No.410 of 2020, Misc Application No.405 of 2020 allowed · Respondent to file reply within two weeks in Appeal No.185 of 2020Appeal: Misc App No.405 of 2020 allowed condoning delay in Appeal Lodging No.410 of 2020; Misc App No.428 of 2020 and Appeal No.185 of 2020 pending with reply ordered, next date 24 November 2020
Source: SecMarx — Nishath Shailesh Gupte. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.