Ms. Pragna Patel
Penalties and directions recorded
- The AO’s findings and monetary directions were challenged; the order records that 13 entities were directed to disgorge illegal gains and 19 entities to pay Rs. 2.5 crore jointly and severally.
- The AO's disgorgement and joint-and-several penalty directions were considered in the appeals; the text provided does not state the individual appellate result.
SAT-appeal
- Manipulation of the price and volume of S. J. Corporation Ltd. through a coordinated fraudulent and unfair trading scheme involving related entities.Appeals 456, 513, 525, 526, 531, 535 and 536 of 2015 disposed of by common decision · Challenge to the AO order dated 26 August 2015 adjudicating violations and monetary liabilityAppeal: Appeal Nos. 456, 513, 525, 526, 531, 535 and 536 of 2015 disposed of by SAT on 25 April 2018; no appeal was filed against the WTM interim or confirmatory orders.
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trading/manipulation in the scrip of S. J. Corporation Ltd. through a coordinated scheme involving connected entities.Appeals challenging the AO order dated 26 August 2015 were disposed of by this common decision. · The AO’s findings and monetary directions were challenged; the order records that 13 entities were directed to disgorge illegal gains and 19 entities to pay Rs. 2.5 crore jointly and severally.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 456, 513, 525, 526, 531, 535 and 536 of 2015; common SAT decision dated 25 April 2018. No appeals were filed against the WTM ad-interim ex-parte order dated 5 February 2010 or confirmatory order dated 24 December 2010.
- Alleged fraudulent and manipulative trading scheme in S. J. Corporation Ltd. shares, involving connected entities and artificial price and volume increases.Appeals challenging the AO order dated 26 August 2015 were heard together and disposed of by a common decision. · The AO's disgorgement and joint-and-several penalty directions were considered in the appeals; the text provided does not state the individual appellate result.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 456, 513, 525, 526, 531, 535 and 536 of 2015; decision dated 25 April 2018. No appeals challenged the 5 February 2010 ad-interim order or 24 December 2010 confirmatory order.
Source: SecMarx — Ms. Pragna Patel. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.