Mrs. Dina Parikh
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appeal No. 122 of 2014 dismissed with no order as to costs; ISE deduction of Rs 33,076 upheld.
SAT-appeal
- Dispute over ISE deducting Rs 33,076 annual fees for FY 2009-10 and 2010-11 from Rs 1 lakh Base Minimum Capital on cancellation; appellant claimed no fees due after April 2005 terminal deactivation and sought refund with 12% interest.Misc. Application No. 63 of 2014 allowed; delay of ~1000 days in filing appeal condoned with no order as to costs. · Appeal No. 122 of 2014 dismissed with no order as to costs; ISE deduction of Rs 33,076 upheld.
- Membership-fee dispute: ISE deducted Rs 33,076 towards annual fees from Rs 1 lakh Base Minimum Capital refund; appellant sought balance plus 12% interest.Misc. Application No. 63 of 2014 allowed: approx 1000 days delay condoned with no order as to costs · Appeal No. 122 of 2014 dismissed with no order as to costs; ISE deduction upheld
Source: SecMarx — Mrs. Dina Parikh. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.