Mr. G. Ramakrishanan
Penalties and directions recorded
- Appeal disposed of; if appellant pays the balance penalty of Rs. 13 lakh by 30 September 2014, SEBI shall consider the interest-waiver application sympathetically.
- The appeals challenged SEBI restraint directions and monetary penalties arising from alleged violations of FUTP Regulations 3 and 4.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-30261186EB18089367971B67Appeal disposed of; if appellant pays the balance penalty of Rs. 13 lakh by 30 September 2014, SEBI shall consider the interest-waiver application sympathetically.Appeal: Appeal No. 232 of 2014 disposed of on 21 August 2014; penalty had earlier been upheld by SAT on 5 October 2012, and review dismissed on 20 January 2014.
- Alleged publication and approval of false and misleading financial results for FY 2007-08, including inflated revenue, profits, security deposits and receivables, resulting in a price rise and enabling promoters to raise funds by pledging shares.SAT disposed of Appeals Nos. 28 to 35 of 2012 by a common order. · The appeals challenged SEBI restraint directions and monetary penalties arising from alleged violations of FUTP Regulations 3 and 4.Appeal: Common SAT order dated 5 October 2012 disposing of Appeals Nos. 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 of 2012; operative disposition beyond the reproduced text is not stated.
- SAT matter SATV-7A84649F231295FDEE47F1FDSame order as in Appeal No.29 of 2012 decided on October 5, 2012Appeal: Appeal No.32 of 2012 decided on 5.10.2012, disposed in terms of Appeal No.29 of 2012 decided on October 5, 2012
Source: SecMarx — Mr. G. Ramakrishanan. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.