Mr. Archit Jindal
Penalties and directions recorded
- AO penalties modified to Rs. 3,00,000 each
- Each appellant directed to pay the modified penalty within four weeks from 31 August 2021
- Penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for all four appellants
- Penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for all four appellants
- Violations affirmed but penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for PIT and SAST violations
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-239FA133FEEB1DE0C0B3C5DDDelay in filing Appeals Nos. 5 to 8 of 2021 condoned · Miscellaneous delay applications allowedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 5, 6, 7 and 8 of 2021 heard together; delay condoned on 27 August 2021 and order reserved
- Failure by promoter-appellants to make required disclosures of changes in shareholding and transactions in the company's scrip under the PIT and SAST Regulations.Violations under the PIT and SAST Regulations affirmed · AO penalties modified to Rs. 3,00,000 eachAppeal: Appeal Nos. 05, 06, 07 and 08 of 2021 decided together and partly allowed on 31 August 2021; violations affirmed and penalties reduced.
- Promoters failed to disclose changes in shareholding on multiple occasions in violation of PIT and SAST disclosure requirements.Violations of PIT Regs 13(4A),13(5) and SAST Regs 29(2),29(3) affirmed · Penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for all four appellantsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 05, 06, 07 and 08 of 2021 reserved on 27.08.2021 and decided on 31.08.2021; partly allowed
- SAT matter SATV-EB0354E2CDCE72382FF66C8ADelay in filing Appeals condoned and Misc. Applications Nos. 954-957 of 2021 allowed · Appeals heard through video conference and order reservedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 5, 6, 7 and 8 of 2021 with Misc. Applications Nos. 954-957 of 2021 (delay condoned, heard on 27.08.2021, order reserved, not finally disposed)
- Promoters failed to disclose changes in shareholding on multiple occasions in violation of PIT and SAST disclosure requirements.Violation of PIT Regs 13(4A),13(5) and SAST Regs 29(2),29(3) affirmed for all appellants · Penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for all four appellantsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 05, 06, 07 and 08 of 2021 decided on 31 August 2021 (reserved 27 August 2021); partly allowed
- SAT matter SATV-59B93970D0F6FAEF6E680023Appeal No. 125 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared for the appellants.Appeal: Appeal No. 125 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecution on 10 March 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-6EEA9B8311E841A3C1160324Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecution on 23.11.2021
- SAT matter SATV-70FE771F8337BE535CF27346Delay condoned; Misc. Applications Nos. 954-957 of 2021 allowed · Appeal Nos. 5-8 of 2021 heard together; order reserved
- SAT matter SATV-727C5FEEF965147328816276Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 disposed on 23.11.2021 - dismissed for want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-87304B8951A01C7A3D766666Delay condoned; Misc. Applications No. 954-957 of 2021 allowed · Appeal Nos. 5-8 of 2021 taken up together as common issue raised; heard and order reservedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8 of 2021 with Misc. Applications 954-957 of 2021 - delay condoned, heard on 27.08.2021, order reserved; not finally disposed
- Promoters failed to disclose changes in shareholding on multiple occasions in violation of PIT and SAST disclosure requirements.Violations affirmed but penalty reduced to Rs 3,00,000 each for PIT and SAST violations · Appeals partly allowed; reduced amount to be paid within four weeks if not paidAppeal: Appeal Nos. 05, 06, 07 and 08 of 2021 decided on 31.08.2021 (reserved 27.08.2021) - partly allowed
- SAT matter SATV-D6A6D0BE49A7A9DEAC0C11D9Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 dismissed for want of prosecution · Parties directed to act on digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or emailAppeal: Appeal Nos. 125, 126 and 130 of 2021 decided on 23.11.2021 - dismissed for want of prosecution
Source: SecMarx — Mr. Archit Jindal. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.