Mr. Ankur Chaturvedi
Penalties and directions recorded
- SEBI to accept two cheques tendered in full and final settlement of AO orders both dated 11.01.2010
- Appeal Nos.41 and 42 of 2010 dismissed, adjudication orders upheld
- SEBI adjudication penalties of Rs.5 lakh and Rs.2 lakh upheld
- SEBI directed to accept two cheques for balance penalty in full and final settlement of AO orders dated 11.01.2010
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-1D9D6FED2140EB780375753AAppeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 41 of 2010 decided on 7 June 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 42 of 2010 decided on 7 June 2010; disposed of by the same order as Appeal No. 41 of 2010
- SAT matter SATV-4926902A43406B4AE6D9FEADMiscellaneous Applications and Review Applications were allowed to be withdrawn · No order as to costsAppeal: Review Applications Nos. 8, 9 and 10 of 2015 in Appeals Nos. 434, 435 and 436 of 2014 were withdrawn and disposed of on 27 January 2016
- SAT matter SATV-7A8FA8A89ABA88D3DBFCB8E8Both Review Applications and both Miscellaneous Applications disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 257 and 258 of 2015 disposed; Review Application Nos. 11-12 of 2015 and Misc. Application Nos. 376-377 of 2015 in Appeal Nos. 41-42 of 2010 disposed as infructuous on 02.02.2016
- SAT matter SATV-9B7300CE268AF8EDAB367B98SEBI to accept two cheques tendered in full and final settlement of AO orders both dated 11.01.2010 · Attachment extended for two weeks from 02.02.2016 to enable encashmentAppeal: Appeal Nos. 257 and 258 of 2015 with Misc. Applications 177-178 of 2015 disposed on 02.02.2016 with no costs
- Failure to furnish material information/documents to investigating officer despite summons, violating Sections 11C and 15A(a) of SEBI Act, 1992.Appeal Nos.41 and 42 of 2010 dismissed, adjudication orders upheld · No order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos.41 and 42 of 2010 dismissed on 7.6.2010
- Failure to make timely disclosures of share purchases to the company and stock exchange, and entering into an opposite sale transaction in violation of the Model Code of Conduct.Appeal No. 434 of 2014 dismissed · SEBI adjudication penalties of Rs.5 lakh and Rs.2 lakh upheldAppeal: Appeal No. 434 of 2014 dismissed by SAT on 4 August 2015.
- SAT matter SATV-6D626BC95A99E051F38A00CFReview Applications and Miscellaneous Applications disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Review Application Nos. 11-12 of 2015 and Misc. Application Nos. 376-377 of 2015 in Appeal Nos. 41-42 of 2010 disposed as infructuous on 02.02.2016
- SAT matter SATV-B6D6599CAFE734F06334EA56SEBI directed to accept two cheques for balance penalty in full and final settlement of AO orders dated 11.01.2010 · Attachment on appellants assets extended for two weeks from 02.02.2016 to enable encashmentAppeal: Appeal Nos. 257 and 258 of 2015 with Misc. Applications 177-178 of 2015 for condonation of delay disposed on 02.02.2016 with no order as to costs
Source: SecMarx — Mr. Ankur Chaturvedi. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.