Maulik Diamonds
Penalties and directions recorded
- Restraint imposed by ex-parte ad-interim orders dated April 23, 2009 vacated
- Liberty to SEBI to pass such final order as it deems fit on said interim orders
- Restraint imposed by ex-parte ad-interim orders dated 23 April 2009 vacated
- Liberty to SEBI to pass such final order as it deems fit on said interim orders
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-E9DF61C0E73D59B70C0A6945Miscellaneous Application Nos. 106, 107, 108 of 2013 allowed by consent · Restraint imposed by ex-parte ad-interim orders dated April 23, 2009 vacatedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 170, 171 and 172 of 2013 with Misc Applications 106-108 of 2013 disposed of on 12.11.2013
- SAT matter SATV-E55CE660289DAF33AF31447AMisc Applications 106-108 of 2013 allowed by consent · Restraint under ex-parte ad-interim order dated 23 April 2009 vacatedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 170, 171, 172 of 2013 with Misc Applications 106-108 of 2013 disposed on 12.11.2013; restraint vacated
- SAT matter SATV-FD113604A0A66AA18847F8ABMiscellaneous Applications No.106, 107, 108 of 2013 allowed by consent · Restraint imposed by ex-parte ad-interim orders dated 23 April 2009 vacatedAppeal: Appeals No.170, 171 and 172 of 2013 disposed of on 12.11.2013; interim restraint vacated with liberty to SEBI to pass final order
Source: SecMarx — Maulik Diamonds. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.