Mathalai Manikandan
Penalties and directions recorded
- Impugned adjudication orders quashed
- Matter remitted to the Adjudicating Officer for fresh orders in light of Sudhir Bapusaheb Devkar v. SEBI
- Impugned adjudication orders quashed.
- Matters remitted to the Adjudicating Officer for fresh orders in light of Sudhir Bapusaheb Devkar v. SEBI.
- Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashing penalty set aside
SAT-appeal
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by the appellants, allegedly violating Regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations.Delay in filing the appeals condoned and miscellaneous applications allowed · Impugned adjudication orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 disposed of on 12 July 2023; impugned orders quashed and matters remitted
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by the appellants, alleged to violate the disclosure obligation under Regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations.Delay in filing the appeals condoned and miscellaneous applications allowed. · Impugned adjudication orders quashed.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 allowed on 12 July 2023; impugned orders quashed and matters remitted.
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015Delay in filing appeals condoned · Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashing penalty set asideAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 with Misc. Applications 802 to 811 of 2023 allowed on 12.07.2023, delay condoned
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015.Delay in filing appeals condoned; misc applications allowed · Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 with Misc. Applications 802 to 811 of 2023 allowed and remanded vide SAT order dated 12.07.2023
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015.Delay in filing appeals condoned; Misc. Applications 802-811 of 2023 allowed · Impugned AO orders quashed; Appeal Nos. 588-597 of 2023 allowedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588-597 of 2023 with Misc. Applications 802-811 of 2023 decided 12.07.2023 - allowed and remanded
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants found in violation of PIT Regulations disclosure requirements.Delay in filing appeals condoned and applications allowed · Impugned Adjudicating Officer penalty orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588-597 of 2023 with Misc. Appl. 802-811 of 2023 allowed on 12.07.2023; AO orders quashed and remanded
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015.Delay in filing appeals condoned · Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 allowed on 12.07.2023; AO penalty orders quashed and remanded
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by the appellants, alleged to violate the disclosure requirement under Regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations.Delay in filing the appeals condoned and miscellaneous applications allowed · Impugned adjudication orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 allowed on 12 July 2023; impugned orders quashed and matters remitted to the Adjudicating Officer.
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants found in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015.Delay in filing appeals condoned · Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588-597 of 2023 allowed on 12.07.2023; Misc. Applications Nos. 802-811 of 2023 for delay condonation allowed
- Non-disclosure of trades executed by appellants found in violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, 2015.Delay in filing appeals condoned · Impugned Adjudicating Officer orders quashedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 588 to 597 of 2023 allowed on 12.07.2023; impugned AO penalty orders quashed and remanded
Source: SecMarx — Mathalai Manikandan. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.