Manish Thakkar
SAT-appeal
- KE Consultancy Group / Manish Thakkar allegedly offering unauthorized portfolio management services and mobilizing funds from publicClarified impugned order does not prohibit respondent no.2 from settling accounts and paying appellants · All three Appeals No. 96, 104 and 105 of 2013 disposed of in above terms
- Unauthorised portfolio management services and mobilisation of funds from public by unregistered entity.All three appeals (Nos. 96, 104, 105 of 2013) disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. · Clarified respondent no.2 not prohibited from settling accounts and paying appellants under direction to resolve complaints.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 96, 104 and 105 of 2013 disposed on 30.08.2013 with no order as to costs.
- Alleged unauthorized portfolio management activities and mobilizing funds from public without SEBI registration.All three appeals disposed as nothing survives with no order as to costs · Clarified para 16(e) does not prohibit respondent no.2 from settling accounts and paying appellantsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 96, 104 and 105 of 2013 disposed on 30.08.2013 with no order as to costs
Source: SecMarx — Manish Thakkar. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.