Manish Pancholi
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-6D652681AFBCB2E0F1668CD6Same order as in Appeal No. 33 of 2009 decided on 19.1.2010Appeal: Appeal No. 37 of 2009 decided on 19.1.2010 in same terms as Appeal No. 33 of 2009
- Allegedly aided promoters of Advik Laboratories Ltd in synchronized trading creating artificial volume and misleading appearance, violating PFUTP Regulations 4(1) and 4(2)(a).Appeal allowed · Adjudicating Officer order dated 11 November 2011 set asideAppeal: Appeal No. 220 of 2011 decided on 1 May 2012 - allowed, impugned AO order set aside
Source: SecMarx — Manish Pancholi. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.