Manilal D. Kotecha
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-131C32485244FA3227032F68Appeal disposed by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 146 of 2009 decided on 29 January 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 189 of 2009 decided on 29 January 2010; order states it is the same as the order in Appeal No. 146 of 2009 decided on that date
- The appellants were held by SEBI to have aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha in violating various securities laws.Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 permitted to be withdrawn. · Liberty granted to file fresh appeals after SEBI passes a final order against Nirmal Kotecha.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 withdrawn on 12 December 2014, with liberty to file fresh appeals after SEBI's final order in Nirmal Kotecha's case.
- The appellants were held by the WTM to have aided and abetted Mr. Nirmal Kotecha in violating the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations.Findings that the appellants aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha were set aside. · All five appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 119, 121, 122, 123 and 124 of 2018 disposed of by SAT on 26 April 2018.
- The appellants were held by SEBI to have aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha in violating securities laws.All five appeals were permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants were granted liberty to file fresh appeals after SEBI passes a final order against Nirmal Kotecha.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 were withdrawn on 12 December 2014 with liberty to file fresh appeals after SEBI's final order in Nirmal Kotecha's case.
- SAT matter SATV-288968BFF1A2AD7037CCB75CSEBI directed to pass a final order in the pending proceedings within four months from 3 September 2013. · Appellants to file reply or additional reply within two weeks from 3 September 2013.Appeal: Appeals Nos. 142, 143, 144, 145 and 146 of 2013, decided and disposed of on 3 September 2013; miscellaneous applications for condonation of delay also disposed of.
- The appellants were held by the WTM to have aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha in violating the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations.Findings that the appellants aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha were set aside to that extent. · All five appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 119, 121, 122, 123 and 124 of 2018 disposed of by SAT on 26 April 2018; findings against appellants set aside to the stated extent.
- SAT matter SATV-45C4672D2D2D79C156E6FD14Dispose Appeals 142-146 of 2013 and Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 with no order as to costs · SEBI to pass final order in pending proceedings within four months from 03.09.2013 with cooperation of partiesAppeal: Appeal Nos. 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 of 2013 with Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 disposed on 03.09.2013 with directions to SEBI
- Allegedly aiding and abetting one Mr. Nirmal Kotecha in violating various provisions of securities laws framed by SEBI.All five appeals permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals when SEBI passes final order in Nirmal Kotecha case · All contentions of both sides kept openAppeal: Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 withdrawn with liberty on 12.12.2014; no costs
- Alleged aiding and abetting Mr. Nirmal Kotecha in violating the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations, 2003Findings that each appellant aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha set aside · All appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 119, 121, 122, 123 and 124 of 2018 disposed of on 26.04.2018 with aiding-abetting findings set aside
- SAT matter SATV-6188503FD419CF3FB6811D0DDispose Appeals 142-146 of 2013 and Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 with no order as to costs · SEBI to pass final order in pending proceedings within four months from 03.09.2013Appeal: Appeals No. 142, 143, 144, 145 and 146 of 2013 with Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 disposed on 03.09.2013 with directions to SEBI
- Alleged aiding and abetting of Mr. Nirmal Kotecha in violating the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations, 2003.Findings that each appellant aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha in violating SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations set aside · All appeals disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 119, 121, 122, 123 and 124 of 2018 disposed on 26.04.2018 with aiding-abetting findings set aside
- Alleged aiding and abetting of Nirmal Kotecha in violating various provisions of SEBI securities laws.All five appeals (Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014) permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals when SEBI passes final order in Nirmal Kotecha case · All contentions of both sides kept openAppeal: Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 withdrawn with liberty vide SAT order dated 12.12.2014
- Alleged aiding and abetting Mr. Nirmal Kotecha in violating SEBI Act and PFUTP RegulationsFindings that each appellant aided and abetted Nirmal Kotecha set aside to that extent · All five appeals disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 119, 121, 122, 123 and 124 of 2018 disposed on 26.04.2018 with aiding-abetting findings set aside
- SAT matter SATV-E36D16D21A9FCC7FB5E5866BSEBI to pass final order in pending proceedings within four months from 03.09.2013 · SEBI to decide cross-examination applications as per law after receipt of repliesAppeal: Appeal Nos. 142, 143, 144, 145 and 146 of 2013 with Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 disposed on 03.09.2013 with directions; no further appeal mentioned
- SAT matter SATV-FE452799B3D04F034D2A36ACSEBI directed to pass final order in pending proceedings within four months from 03.09.2013 · Appellants to file reply / additional reply within two weeks from 03.09.2013Appeal: Appeal Nos. 142, 143, 144, 145 and 146 of 2013 with Misc. Applications 77-81 of 2013 disposed on 03.09.2013 with directions to SEBI; stay not granted
- Alleged aiding and abetting Nirmal Kotecha in violating various SEBI securities laws.All five appeals permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals after SEBI final order in Nirmal Kotecha case · No costs imposedAppeal: Appeal Nos. 48, 49, 52, 54 and 186 of 2014 withdrawn on 12.12.2014 with liberty to file fresh appeals after final SEBI order against Nirmal Kotecha
Source: SecMarx — Manilal D. Kotecha. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.