M/s. Rajesh Service Centre
Penalties and directions recorded
- Matters remanded to the AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
- Matters remanded to the AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
- Set aside AO order dated 26/11/2013 imposing penalty on both appellants
- Remanded matters to AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
SAT-appeal
- Allegedly aiding and abetting Edserv Softsystems Ltd. in siphoning off IPO proceeds by acting as channels to transfer the funds to other layers, thereby harming existing and IPO investors.Impugned AO order dated 26 November 2013 set aside · Matters remanded to the AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 131 and 132 of 2015 disposed of on 20 April 2016; correction order issued on 26 April 2016
- Aiding and abetting Edserv Softsystems Ltd. in siphoning off IPO proceeds, allegedly acting as channels to transfer the proceeds to other layers and causing investor loss.Delay of 119 days in filing each appeal condoned · Impugned AO order dated 26 November 2013 set asideAppeal: Appeal Nos. 131 and 132 of 2015 disposed of by SAT on 20 April 2016; correction order dated 26 April 2016 amended the cited Kejas Parmar appeal number to Appeal No. 419 of 2014.
- Aiding and abetting Edserv Softsystems Ltd in siphoning off IPO proceeds by acting as channel to transfer siphoned funds to other layers, causing loss to investors.Condoned 119 days delay via Misc. Applications No.84 and 85 of 2015 · Set aside AO order dated 26/11/2013 imposing penalty on both appellantsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 131 & 132 of 2015 disposed on 20/04/2016; correction order issued on 26/04/2016
Source: SecMarx — M/s. Rajesh Service Centre. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.