Konark Commerce & Industries Ltd.
Penalties and directions recorded
- Each appellant was directed to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBI.
- Each appellant was directed to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBI.
- Tribunal declined to recall its earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution.
- Time extended for each appellant to pay Rs.25,000 costs to SEBI until 3 July 2018.
- Each appellant must pay additional costs of Rs.5,000 to SEBI by 3 July 2018.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-0100CAE777FD298F7DABF434Appeals Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 and corresponding Miscellaneous Applications were permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants were granted liberty to file fresh appeals and Miscellaneous Applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal with liberty to file fresh appeals, subject to costs.
- SAT matter SATV-059B4CC8C334CFCCCD655FAFAll Appeals Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 and corresponding Miscellaneous Applications were permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants were granted liberty to file fresh appeals and Miscellaneous Applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 were disposed of on 5 March 2018 as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh appeals subject to costs and timelines.
- SAT matter SATV-08CB88CA5AFAFD91AAFF31A6Appeals Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 and corresponding Miscellaneous Applications were permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants were granted liberty to file fresh appeals and applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal, with liberty to file fresh appeals subject to costs.
- SAT matter SATV-15F04F63C8C1E1FE64FD74A721 applications seeking recall and restoration were dismissed. · Tribunal declined to recall its earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019; recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019; third recall applications dismissed on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-174F11043B57106542428EFCTime extended for each appellant to pay Rs.25,000 costs to SEBI until 3 July 2018. · Each appellant must pay additional costs of Rs.5,000 to SEBI by 3 July 2018.Appeal: Miscellaneous Applications Nos.146-165 of 2018 in Appeals Nos.14-33 of 2018 disposed of on 19 June 2018; fresh appeals permitted subject to conditions.
- SAT matter SATV-1CABE2F41BA76FE00FF45C62Applications seeking recall of earlier dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were rejected. · The Tribunal found a casual approach and did not accept the appellants' lack-of-knowledge contention.Appeal: Appeals against the AO order dated 16 August 2017 were withdrawn, refiled belatedly, dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019; recall application dismissed on 04 October 2019; further recall applications decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-1E48B7D9673ACCE967A40CB2Appeals and connected miscellaneous applications withdrawn and disposed of · Each appellant permitted to file fresh appeals and applications with additional grounds and documentsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal with liberty to file fresh appeals; connected Misc. Applications Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 also disposed of
- SAT matter SATV-1E97AEF7D769D49F29F89F5DAll appeals and connected miscellaneous applications permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants granted liberty to file fresh appeals and miscellaneous applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal with liberty to file fresh appeals; connected Misc. Application Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 also withdrawn.
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices and manipulation in the securities market, violating Section 12A of the SEBI Act and the FUTP Regulations.Common ex-parte adjudication order dated 31 December 2013 set aside in all appeals. · SEBI directed to pass fresh orders after hearing the appellants and Harish Sureka.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 disposed of on 15 December 2015; all appeals allowed subject to directions.
- SAT matter SATV-274DF0580F8DD7E7A81DA3A8Appeals and connected Miscellaneous Applications permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants granted liberty to file fresh appeals and Miscellaneous Applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal, with liberty to file fresh appeals.
- SAT matter SATV-2E1F304E856FB65EE0A8A044Applications seeking recall of dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were dismissed. · Tribunal found a casual approach and lack of diligence in pursuing the appeals.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019, including 21 connected matters; appeals had earlier been dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, and recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019.
- SAT matter SATV-2FDF89358A1E05A0B2035A12Applications for recall and restoration were dismissed due to the appellants' casual and delayed conduct. · Earlier dismissal orders for want of prosecution remained undisturbed.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281, 282, 283, 284-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, with recall applications dismissed on 04 October 2019; present recall applications dismissed on 06 September 2021
- SAT matter SATV-2FA5549BECC27EFC02F5E19EAppeals and connected miscellaneous applications permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants granted liberty to file fresh appeals and miscellaneous applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal, with liberty to file fresh proceedings.
- SAT matter SATV-23222AB32B17E2CD95408878Applications seeking recall of dismissal orders and restoration of appeals were rejected. · Tribunal found a casual approach and no satisfactory explanation for the delay and repeated non-prosecution.Appeal: Twenty-one recall applications in appeal lodging matters were heard and rejected on 06 September 2021; underlying appeals had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.
- SAT matter SATV-2143A959FE26DC313157C814Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications disposed accordingly with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016; extension to comply with Tribunal order dated 15.12.2015
- SAT matter SATV-27170ED35387DE5AB0BFD03CTime to comply with Tribunal order dated 15.12.2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeal Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016; extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-32877FBFFEABF9C53A938094Order dated 06.09.2021 deciding recall applications seeking recall of 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 orders · Tribunal recorded very casual approach and disbelieved plea of unawareness of dismissalAppeal: Misc. Appl. Nos. 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019 and recall application dismissed on 04.10.2019; restoration sought, decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-41E620508D65E7648927306CAppeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals and fresh Misc. Applications · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Application Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to refile
- SAT matter SATV-2FBC4D5BDAD07720A2E76168Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications disposed of with no order as to costs
- SAT matter SATV-3AFEB60EB511B9CA307DE6F7Appeal Nos.14-33/2018 and Misc. Application Nos.14-33/2018 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs.25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos.14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Application Nos.14 to 33 of 2018 disposed as withdrawn with liberty on 05.03.2018
- SAT matter SATV-51C5F8A52D57C04875D0279DAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 seeking recall of SAT orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals; decision dated 06.09.2021
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities of Brooks Laboratories Ltd. in violation of Section 12A and PFUTP Regulations 3-4.Impugned ex-parte order dated 31.12.2013 set aside subject to payment of costs · Appellants permitted to file detailed reply to show cause notice and SEBI to hear them with Harish SurekaAppeal: Appeal Nos. 26-40 of 2015 allowed on 15.12.2015; prior Appeal No.57 of 2014 (Harish Sureka) allowed on 16.06.2014 remanding same 31.12.2013 order
- SAT matter SATV-5D6FD2DE980E4A92F252333CAll Appeal Nos. 256 to 270 of 2014 and Misc. Applications allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh · Refund of Court fees allowed as per lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 256 to 270 of 2014 with Misc. Applications 106-121 of 2014 withdrawn with liberty, disposed on 24.11.2014
- SAT matter SATV-74997C1D93FB95B3DCFDA40CDismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Misc. Application No. 97 of 2019 in Appeal (L) No. 281 of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019
- SAT matter SATV-6B3806B2DE6DA5B832F17F7CWithdrawal of Appeal Nos.14-33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs.25,000 to SEBI within two weeks from 05.03.2018Appeal: Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 and Appeal Nos.14-33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals
- SAT matter SATV-89B35167D6FF4152B1427EE721 Misc. Applications for recall of SAT orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals rejected/dismissed for casual approach and want of prosecution
- SAT matter SATV-9930A3EE1BDC1E07ACD3AE44Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 disposed accordingly with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals No.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-9E5F9AC61E73B5CAC2B899CARecall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 sought for restoration of appeals; Tribunal held casual approach and disbelieved unawareness plea
- SAT matter SATV-8DABCEF1CA7C13986D54C474Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-98CA0C19A6D19B4458720BB3Time to pass order pursuant to SAT order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeal No.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-4B11873C9CC9CF5B034C80CBAll appeals and connected miscellaneous applications permitted to be withdrawn. · Appellants granted liberty to file fresh appeals and miscellaneous applications with additional grounds and documents.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal, with liberty to file fresh appeals subject to costs.
- SAT matter SATV-B298D04E4D46714BA96E5B9121 recall applications for recall of SAT orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals heard; Tribunal notes casual approachAppeal: Misc. Applications 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 seeking recall of SAT dismissal orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019; decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-4882E26B527D596CB07D677CApplications seeking recall and restoration of the appeals were dismissed. · Tribunal found a casual approach and lack of prosecution by the appellants.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019, and the present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities market relating to Brooks Laboratories Ltd. in violation of Section 12A and PFUTP Regulations 3-4.All 15 Appeals (Nos. 26-40 of 2015) allowed · Common ex-parte adjudication order dated 31.12.2013 set aside subject to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 disposed on 15.12.2015; allowed and remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing
- SAT matter SATV-C7874DB315BE56C50EE2C300Appeals Nos.14-33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications Nos.14-33 of 2018 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals/applications · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs.25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos.14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications Nos.14 to 33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals
- SAT matter SATV-510691100363A3CCBF0FDD35Applications for recall and restoration were rejected/dismissed. · Appeals had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.Appeal: Multiple appeal lodging matters, including Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, and recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019. Present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-D833C4DC0EA2A036B393D39521 recall applications seek recall of SAT orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals · Tribunal noted casual approach and disbelieved plea of unawareness of dismissal for want of prosecution
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities of Brooks Laboratories Ltd. in violation of Section 12A of SEBI Act and Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations.Common ex-parte AO order dated 31.12.2013 set aside subject to payment of costs · Appellants permitted to file detailed reply to show cause notices and serve SEBI within one monthAppeal: Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 allowed on 15.12.2015 and remanded to SEBI for fresh order after hearing
- SAT matter SATV-DAEEAAA6C2858BEF4F5B136BWithdrawal of Appeal Nos. 14-33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh · Fresh appeals with Misc. Applications, if any, to be filed within three weeks from 05.03.2018Appeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh
- SAT matter SATV-E0B645B8AA8D7A72CAB97A42Withdrawal of Appeal Nos 14-33 of 2018 and Misc Apps 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos 14-33 of 2018 with Misc Apps 14-33 of 2018 withdrawn with liberty and disposed on 05.03.2018
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities market relating to Brooks Laboratories Ltd. in violation of Section 12A and FUTP Regulations.Impugned ex-parte AO order dated 31.12.2013 set aside qua all appellants subject to costs · Appellants permitted to file detailed reply to SCN and serve SEBI within one monthAppeal: Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 allowed and disposed by common SAT order dated 15.12.2015; matter remanded to SEBI for fresh order
- SAT matter SATV-F45CEA4566E2D4E9C9A16949Appeal Nos. 256 to 270 of 2014 and Misc. Applications allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed · Appellants permitted to file fresh appeals with Misc. Applications within four weeks from 24.11.2014Appeal: Appeal Nos. 256 to 270 of 2014 with Misc. Applications 106 to 121 of 2014 withdrawn with liberty and disposed on 24.11.2014
- SAT matter SATV-F8FF364E0A1CA02F578A2E9521 misc applications seeking recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals taken up on 06.09.2021 · Tribunal observed casual approach and unexplained delay by appellants in pursuing matterAppeal: Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019 against AO order dated 16.08.2017 dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019; recall dismissed on 04.10.2019; fresh recall filed 30.10.2020 decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-65B279BC3A2CA858EC9D905BApplications for recall and restoration of the appeals were dismissed.Appeal: Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019, recall applications were dismissed on 04 October 2019, and the present recall applications were decided on 06 September 2021.
- SAT matter SATV-516DE8A1D8E15C34FB16AD54Tribunal considered 21 applications for recall of orders dated 05 April 2019 and 04 October 2019 and restoration of appeals; observed casual approach (full operative part truncated)
- SAT matter SATV-5F487001FE3DCD4DAFD12134Misc applications for recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals rejected
- Alleged violation of Section 12A(a),(b),(c) and FUTP Regulations 3(a)-(d), 4(1), 4(2)(a),(e) in matter of Brooks Laboratories Ltd.Impugned ex-parte order dated 31 December 2013 set aside subject to payment of costs · Appellants permitted to file detailed reply to show cause notices and serve SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 allowed and disposed by SAT common order dated 15.12.2015; impugned order set aside and remanded
- SAT matter SATV-7500E6A34F065C60065DA1C8Withdrawal of Appeal Nos. 14-33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to refile
- Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in securities relating to Brooks Laboratories Ltd. violating Sec 12A and FUTP Regs 3-4.Impugned ex-parte AO order dated 31.12.2013 set aside subject to payment of costs · Appellants permitted to file detailed reply to SCN and serve SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos 26-40 of 2015 allowed on 15.12.2015 with remand; prior Appeal No 57 of 2014 (Harish Sureka) allowed on 16.06.2014 quashing same order
- SAT matter SATV-A7634AAB2537EA73E9B5081BAppeals and Misc. Applications permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14 to 33 of 2018 withdrawn with liberty and disposed of on 05.03.2018
- SAT matter SATV-AD4801FE1120EF1490CE4A64Appeals Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeals · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Application Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of as withdrawn with liberty on 05.03.2018
- SAT matter SATV-ACA54A4A990F061139EA253921 applications seek recall of orders dated 05.04.2019 and 04.10.2019 and restoration of appeals · Tribunal notes casual prosecution and rejects unawareness plea as afterthought
- SAT matter SATV-B7B451A83D4EBD50EC01EF95Appeal Nos. 14-33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 disposed as withdrawn with liberty on 05.03.2018
- SAT matter SATV-AD60B8379E488AEEEB21EEABTime to pass final order as contemplated by common order dated 28 October 2016 extended by three months from today · All Misc. Applications disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 159-173 of 2017 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 18.05.2017 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-D8F08586996D12EDA036C422Withdrawal of Appeal Nos. 14-33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Application Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh
- SAT matter SATV-CD6C14815075865308F684C8Withdrawal of Appeal Nos. 14-33 of 2018 and Misc. Applications 14-33 of 2018 permitted with liberty to file fresh appeals · Each appellant to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to SEBIAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 with Misc. Applications 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed on 05.03.2018 as withdrawn with liberty to refile
- SAT matter SATV-F92293933C4C83E99EB17ABCAppeal: Appeal Lodging Nos 281-300/2018 and 107/2019 vs AO order 16.08.2017 dismissed 05.04.2019; recall dismissed 04.10.2019; fresh Misc 603-622/2020 and 994/2021 filed 30.10.2020 decided 06.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-E5BF8EFA3BE0F9D8568ACFFATime to pass order in terms of Tribunal order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications No.261 to 275 of 2016 disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeal Nos.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-E72C0765E84A4AFCE7789AE2Appeal: Misc. Applications 603-622 of 2020 and 994 of 2021 in Appeal Lodging Nos. 281-300 of 2018 and 107 of 2019; appeals dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.04.2019; recall dismissed on 04.10.2019; restoration sought, decision on 06.09.2021
Source: SecMarx — Konark Commerce & Industries Ltd.. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.