Kejas Parmar

SAT-appeal

• Alleged adoption of fraudulent and deceptive devices violating Section 12A read with PFUTP Reg 3 and 4, including alleged certification of financial statements for April 2011-March 2012.
  Set aside June 30, 2014 AO ex-parte order qua all four appellants · Remand matters to AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 419 of 2014, 431 of 2014, 136 of 2015 and 341 of 2014 disposed on 15.04.2016 by remand; Misc App 188/2014 and 92/2015 allowed
• Alleged use of fraudulent and deceptive devices in securities market violating Section 12A of SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003, including alleged certification of financial statements.
  Set aside AO common order dated 30.06.2014 qua all four appellants · Remand matters to AO for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 419 of 2014, 431 of 2014, 136 of 2015 and 341 of 2014 disposed of on 15.04.2016 by remand to AO
• Alleged adoption of fraudulent and deceptive devices violating SEBI Act Sec 12A(a),(b),(c) and PFUTP Regs 3 and 4, including disputed certification of financials.
  Set aside common AO ex-parte order dated 30.06.2014 qua all four appellants · Remand all matters to AO for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law expeditiously
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 419/2014, 431/2014, 136/2015, 341/2014 disposed of on 15.04.2016 by remand to AO; no further appeal mentioned
• Alleged use of fraudulent and deceptive devices in securities market violating Sec 12A and PFUTP Regs 3 and 4, including alleged certification of financial statements April 2011-March 2012.
  Set aside common AO order dated 30.06.2014 qua all four appellants · Restore matters to AO for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 419 of 2014, 431 of 2014, 136 of 2015 and 341 of 2014 disposed of on 15.04.2016 by set aside and remand; Misc Apps 188/2014 and 92/2015 allowed