Kanwal Jit Singh
Penalties and directions recorded
- Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on video vs physical hearing
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-630E463069D6DA8627077537Appeal No. 595 of 2021 dismissed on ground of laches · Misc. Applications No. 1131 and 1132 of 2021 for condonation of delay rejectedAppeal: Appeal No. 595 of 2021 with Misc. Applications No. 1131-1132 of 2021 disposed on 30.09.2021 as dismissed on laches after 195 days delay
- SAT matter SATV-9D26810E832DF1DF1D4E2A16Review Application No.18 of 2021 in Appeal No.595 of 2021 dismissed without any order as to costs · All concerned parties directed to act on digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or email
- SAT matter SATV-9ED7C64879807C860D041D11Misc. Application No. 344 of 2016 allowed to be withdrawn · Liberty granted to file substantive appeal against WTM order dated October 3, 2016Appeal: Misc. Application No. 344 of 2016 in Appeal No. 6 of 2016 withdrawn and disposed on 09.01.2017 with liberty to file substantive appeal
- SAT matter SATV-BF537174AAE4B851B89A8911Appellant to get memo of appeal scanned and send to Registry on email provided within two weeks · List appeal for admission on September 30, 2021Appeal: Appeal No. 595 of 2021 pending, listed for admission on September 30, 2021
- Alleged illegal termination of UTI assured-return scheme (SCUP) and wrongful denial of interest/compensation on delayed redemption claimed in 2014.Appeal No.79 of 2017 and Misc. Application No.294 of 2017 dismissed with no order as to costs
- Challenge to SEBI rejection dated 12.08.2015 of SCORES complaint dated 12.11.2014 against UTI entities; allegation various contentions were not considered.Misc Application No.08/2016 allowed: waive court fees, appropriate fees paid in Appeal 434/2015 · Impugned SEBI communication dated 12.08.2015 allowed to be withdrawnAppeal: Appeal No.06 of 2016 disposed of on 26.04.2016 by remand for fresh order; prior Appeal No.434 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeal
- Challenge to SEBI communication dated August 12, 2015 disposing appellant's complaint against UTI entities; review sought alleging non-consideration of Govt order and natural justice violation.Review Application No. 7 of 2016 in Appeal No. 6 of 2016 dismissed as without merit with no order as to costs
- SAT matter SATV-9CC5802644CCDB64E9F36845Misc. Application No. 329 of 2015 and Appeal No. 434 of 2015 allowed to be withdrawn · Liberty granted to file fresh appeal within two weeks; no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 434 of 2015 with Misc. Application No. 329 of 2015 withdrawn with liberty to file fresh; decided 17.12.2015
Source: SecMarx — Kanwal Jit Singh. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.