Kamal Kuchana
Penalties and directions recorded
- Orders passed against the appellants were quashed.
- Matters restored to the file of the adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law.
- Impugned AO orders quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits per law
- Orders passed against appellants quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
- Orders passed against appellants quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-2C51062D8FDDA126FA54D3EEOrders passed against the appellants were quashed. · Matters restored to the file of the adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 321, 342, 343, 344 and 345 of 2014 disposed of on 27 April 2016; impugned orders quashed and remanded for fresh decision.
- SAT matter SATV-4B916E450851D7B05C852096Impugned AO orders quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits per law · All contentions of both parties kept open
- SAT matter SATV-C4FA7A6727B17159261CDD98Orders passed against appellants quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law · All contentions of both parties kept openAppeal: Appeal Nos. 321, 342, 343, 344 and 345 of 2014 disposed of on 27.04.2016 in same terms as order dated 15.04.2016 in Appeal No. 419 of 2014 and Appeal No. 341 of 2014
- SAT matter SATV-FE376CE2C48D388F3CA4EC96Delay condoned in Misc. Applications 151, 159 and 160 of 2014 · Orders passed against appellants quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with lawAppeal: Appeal Nos. 321, 342, 343, 344 and 345 of 2014 disposed on 27.04.2016; Misc. Applications 151, 159, 160 of 2014 disposed with delay condoned
- SAT matter SATV-B3F9A919F6A337225A6EA87AImpugned orders against appellants quashed and restored to adjudicating officer for fresh decision on merits · All contentions of both parties kept openAppeal: Appeal Nos. 321, 342, 343, 344 and 345 of 2014 disposed on 27.04.2016 by quashing and remand to AO
Source: SecMarx — Kamal Kuchana. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.