K. Venkatraman
Penalties and directions recorded
- Parties directed to contact the Registrar 48 hours before the hearing date regarding hearing mode
- Parties to take instructions from the Registrar 48 hours before the listed date regarding video-conference or physical hearing
- Parties to contact Registrar 48 hours before date fixed to ascertain video conferencing or physical hearing
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-135B45D9E4343B2700B0CDACRespondent granted ten days to file reply to the application for condonation of delay · Matter listed for 10 February 2021Appeal: Appeal No. 12 of 2021 with Miscellaneous Application No. 78 of 2021; order dated 1 February 2021; matter adjourned and not disposed of
- SAT matter SATV-1CE57F2BA2FA08CCFAA9E8B3List Misc. Application No. 78 of 2021 and Appeal No. 12 of 2021 on 25 March 2021 · Parties to take instructions from the Registrar 48 hours before the listed date regarding video-conference or physical hearingAppeal: Appeal No. 12 of 2021 was pending; listed for 25 March 2021
- Alleged violation of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 leading to Rs 5 lakh AO penalty (specific charge not detailed in SAT order)Delay condoned and Misc. Application No. 78 of 2021 allowed · AO order dated June 9, 2009 quashed as violative of natural justiceAppeal: Appeal No. 12 of 2021 allowed on 25.03.2021; delay condoned via Misc. Application No. 78 of 2021
- SAT matter SATV-CBB003672763AC6622C71A13List Appeal No. 12 of 2021 on 17th February, 2021 · Rejoinder may be filed in the meanwhileAppeal: Appeal No. 12 of 2021 with Misc. Application No. 78 of 2021 pending; listed on 17th February, 2021
Source: SecMarx — K. Venkatraman. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.