Jimish Jitendrabhai Soni

SAT-appeal

• Appeals against an impugned SEBI order alleging violation of the SEBI PFUTP Regulations through trading in the concerned scrip during the investigation period.
  Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 for additional evidence was allowed. · Appellant to deposit costs of Rs. 20,000 with the Registrar.
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 265 and 267 to 276 of 2019 were pending before SAT; final disposal was listed for 26 April 2021. Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 was allowed.
• SAT matter SATV-14F51BA43697945DB5FFC298
  SEBI to file objection/reply to Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 within two weeks from 22 February 2021 · Appellant to file rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter
  Appeal: Multiple connected appeals, including Appeal Nos. 265 and 267-276 of 2019, remained pending; Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 sought additional evidence and was listed for orders on 19 March 2021.
• SAT matter SATV-1D7089F53FF0571B168A6D72
  Respondent to file objection/reply to Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 within two weeks from 22 February 2021 · Appellant to file rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 265 and 267-276 of 2019 were pending; Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 in Appeal No. 265 of 2019 was directed to be replied to and listed for orders on 19 March 2021.
• Appeals arose from an impugned order concerning alleged violations of the SEBI PFUTP Regulations in trading the scrip during the investigation period.
  Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 for additional evidence was allowed · Appellant to deposit costs of Rs. 20,000 with the Registrar
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 267, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 and 265 of 2019 were pending; final disposal was listed for 26 April 2021
• Appeals arose from an impugned order concerning alleged violations of the SEBI PFUTP Regulations. The appellants disputed that their trading constituted an unfair trade practice.
  Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 for additional evidence was allowed. · Appellant directed to deposit costs of Rs. 20,000 with the Registrar.
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 265, 267, and 270-276 of 2019 were pending; the order dated 19 March 2021 allowed additional evidence in Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 and listed the appeals for final disposal on 26 April 2021.
• Alleged unfair trade practice in trading of scrip in question during investigation period in violation of SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations.
  Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 in Appeal No. 265 of 2019 allowed on payment of costs · Appellant to deposit costs of Rs. 20,000 before Registrar of Tribunal
  Appeal: Appeals Nos. 265, 267, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 of 2019 pending; Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 allowed vide order dated 19.03.2021, listed for final disposal on 26.04.2021
• Alleged violation of the SEBI PFUTP Regulations through trading in the concerned scrip during the investigation period, asserted by SEBI to constitute an unfair trade practice.
  Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 for additional evidence allowed · Appellant to deposit costs of Rs. 20,000 with the Registrar within two weeks from 19 March 2021
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 265, 267, and 270-276 of 2019 were pending before SAT; Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 was allowed. Final disposal was listed for 26 April 2021.
• Alleged violation of the SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations through trading in the relevant scrip during the investigation period, allegedly amounting to unfair trade practice.
  Miscellaneous Application No. 72 of 2021 for additional evidence allowed · Appellant directed to deposit Rs. 20,000 as costs before the Registrar within two weeks from 19 March 2021
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 267, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 and 265 of 2019 were pending before SAT; Misc. Application No. 72 of 2021 in Appeal No. 265 of 2019 was allowed. Final disposal listed for 26 April 2021.
• Penalties originally imposed on appellants as PAC plus additional individual penalty on Jimish Jitendrabhai Soni (underlying charge as per companion Appeal No. 483 of 2018).
  Appeal partly allowed following decision in Appeal No. 483 of 2018. · PAC penalty of Rs. 2 lacs each modified to single Rs. 2 lacs payable jointly and severally.
  Appeal: Appeal No. 423 of 2018 partly allowed by SAT order dated 28.06.2019