Jeyashoba Thankappan Rajam

2 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Quashed AO order dated May 19, 2021 imposing Rs.5 lakhs penalty on each appellant
Adjudicating Officer order dated May 19, 2021 imposing Rs.5 lakhs penalty on each appellant quashed

SAT-appeal

Alleged violation of SEBI ex-parte ad-interim order dated December 10, 2014 by continuing to collect fresh money from investors under existing CIS schemes.
Delay condoned vide Misc. Applications No. 394-395 of 2022 · Quashed AO order dated May 19, 2021 imposing Rs.5 lakhs penalty on each appellant
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 237 and 238 of 2022 with Misc. Applications 394-395 of 2022 allowed on 16.06.2022
Alleged violation of SEBI ex-parte ad-interim order dated December 10, 2014 by continuing to collect fresh money from investors under existing collective investment schemes.
Delay in filing Appeals condoned; Misc Applications No. 394 and 395 of 2022 allowed · Appeal Nos. 237 and 238 of 2022 allowed with no order as to costs
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 237 of 2022 and 238 of 2022 with Misc Applications 394-395 of 2022 allowed and disposed on 16.06.2022

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Jeyashoba Thankappan Rajam. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.