J.C. Mansukhani
Penalties and directions recorded
- AO's Rs 25 lakh joint and several penalty under challenge; SAT observed no merit in appellants' case (full operative part truncated)
- Appeals No.185 of 2014 and 192 of 2014 dismissed; AO order dated 28/03/2014 with Rs.25 lakh joint and several penalty upheld
SAT-appeal
- Delayed dissemination of price sensitive information about bagging two large Iranian orders, violating immediate and continuous disclosure under PIT Regulations.AO's Rs 25 lakh joint and several penalty under challenge; SAT observed no merit in appellants' case (full operative part truncated)
- SAT matter SATV-55CA197BEE6BA4DB9F78E8F8Appeal No. 52 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellantsAppeal: Appeal No. 52 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution on 09.02.2021
- Delayed dissemination of price sensitive information on bagging two large Iranian orders, disclosed 29/04/2009 after delays of 59 days and 7 days.Appeals No.185 of 2014 and 192 of 2014 dismissed; AO order dated 28/03/2014 with Rs.25 lakh joint and several penalty upheld
Source: SecMarx — J.C. Mansukhani. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.