Himani Patel

3 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

WTM direction to disgorge Rs.33,52,636 with interest at 10% upheld or otherwise addressed in the SAT decision text provided.
Separate AO penalty of Rs.55 lakh was challenged in Appeal No. 2 of 2009.

SAT-appeal

Cornering retail-reserved Suzlon IPO shares through hundreds of multiple applications using fictitious/benami or name-lender applicants, manipulating retail demand and violating Section 12A, PFUTP Regulations and DIP Guidelines.
Appeal No. 154 of 2008 was heard with Appeal No. 2 of 2009 and disposed of by common order. · WTM direction to disgorge Rs.33,52,636 with interest at 10% upheld or otherwise addressed in the SAT decision text provided.
Appeal: Appeal No. 154 of 2008 and Appeal No. 2 of 2009 were argued together and disposed of by common order dated 7 September 2009; final disposition is not included in the supplied text.
SAT matter SATV-6E4D3840279201BA18A6549E
Same order as in Appeal No. 154 of 2008 decided on 07.09.2009
Appeal: Appeal No. 2 of 2009 decided on 07.09.2009 - disposed per order in Appeal No. 154 of 2008
SAT matter SATV-D0C96FA77AE3B73C0AE4560D
Same order as in Appeal No. 104 of 2007 decided on 07.07.2008
Appeal: Appeal No. 36 of 2008 decided on 07.07.2008 - disposed per order in Appeal No. 104 of 2007

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Himani Patel. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.