Hemanchal Singh

2 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Appellants to place Rs 60 lakh in fixed deposit in nationalized bank with lien in favour of SEBI

SAT-appeal

Operation of an unregistered investment advisory business and failure to establish the source and nature of monies received, including amounts claimed to be for investment advisory services.
Violations and directions in SEBI's impugned order affirmed. · Matter remitted to the WTM only to determine the actual amount received for investment advisory services.
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 071 of 2024 and 072 of 2024 disposed of by SAT common order dated 26 June 2025; connected miscellaneous applications disposed of.
Operating as unregistered investment advisory and receiving Rs 6.13 crore without producing source documents.
Affirmed violations and directions in WTM order dated 29.11.2022 · Remitted to WTM only to decide actual amount received towards investment advisory services

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Hemanchal Singh. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.