Harsh Shah

4 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

SEBI directed to pay Rs. 25,000 as litigation costs to appellants
Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on mode of hearing

SAT-appeal

No charge against appellants; original 2016 case of PFUTP and Takeover violations by Platinum Corporation and VCPL/Directors; present dispute on freezing appellants' joint demat accounts with mother for recovery/disgorgement.
Impugned WTM order dated April 07, 2020 quashed · Appeal allowed; Misc. Application No. 175 of 2020 for 42 days delay allowed
Appeal: Appeal No. 204 of 2020 allowed on 18 December 2020 (reserved 27 November 2020); delay of 42 days condoned vide Misc. Application No. 175 of 2020
SAT matter SATV-B94A7AAC9846FACEC505850A
Affidavit in rejoinder may be filed within two weeks from 22.09.2020 · Stand over to 05 November 2020 for final disposal
Appeal: Appeal No. 204 of 2020 with Misc. Application No. 175 of 2020 (Delay Application) pending; adjourned to 05 November 2020 for final disposal
SAT matter SATV-F6282EF4BFBF5D70504CE4D3
Appeal withdrawn with permission to make representation to SEBI on defreezing of joint accounts · SEBI to deal with representation per rules and procedures as expeditiously as possible
Appeal: Appeal No. 465 of 2018 with Misc. Application No. 406 of 2018 disposed as withdrawn on 13.12.2018 with no order as to costs
SAT matter SATV-A6117A7934B7C1A510BFF3B7
Order reserved after hearing through video conference · Written submissions may be filed within a week
Appeal: Appeal No. 204 of 2020 with Misc. Application No. 175 of 2020 (Delay Application) heard on 27.11.2020; order reserved

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Harsh Shah. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.